2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000252382.47434.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Satisfaction and Psychological Distress Among Concerned Significant Others of Pathological Gamblers

Abstract: This study explores correlates of psychological distress and relationship satisfaction among concerned significant others (CSOs) of pathological gamblers. CSOs often seek help in dealing with the gambling problem and are influential in recovery, but little is known about the sources of their distress. A sample of 186 CSOs responded to media announcements offering telephone and bibliotherapy support. In multivariate models, CSOs who were spouses and who were younger reported more personal distress, and higher d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
94
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative relationship dynamics can lead to greater gambling severity [5], and it is possible that gambling and violence are reciprocally related, such that perpetrating violence might increase gambling perhaps as a coping or escape strategy, and gambling in turn further increases violence (due to stress); much in the same way as alcohol use and gambling have been shown to be co-related [15,23,24]. The present results suggest that alcohol and drug dependence could be part of the same general cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Negative relationship dynamics can lead to greater gambling severity [5], and it is possible that gambling and violence are reciprocally related, such that perpetrating violence might increase gambling perhaps as a coping or escape strategy, and gambling in turn further increases violence (due to stress); much in the same way as alcohol use and gambling have been shown to be co-related [15,23,24]. The present results suggest that alcohol and drug dependence could be part of the same general cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficult and sometimes discordant interpersonal and family relationships are often amongst the significant negative impacts of problem gambling [4][5][6][7]. Some dysfunctional relationships evolve into violence, and there is growing evidence to show that problem gambling is a specific risk factor for family and intimate partner violence (IPV) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there are fewer studies using quantitative data from non‐clinical samples. These include investigations of self‐selected respondents that document high marital distress among partners of problem gamblers 17, and family dysfunction as reported by problem gamblers themselves 18. Population‐based studies also suggest high rates of mental health problems among people who self‐identify as having a family member with a gambling problem 19, 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among concerned significant others, spouses and intimate partners are typically the ones most affected, primarily in the form of intra-and interpersonal distress (Hodgins et al 2007). Extended family members of problem gamblers, such as parents, are also financially and emotionally affected, especially when the problem gambler has no marital or intimate partner willing or able to act as a primary caregiver (Hodgins et al, 2006;Patford, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging evidence shows that the most common adverse impacts of problem gambling include family and dyadic relationship dysfunction, financial hardship, co-occurring psychopathologies and family conflict (Dowling et al 2009;Hodgins et al 2006;Jackson et al 1999; Kalischuk et al 2006). Among concerned significant others, spouses and intimate partners are typically the ones most affected, primarily in the form of intra-and interpersonal distress (Hodgins et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%