Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown

Abstract

Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected posthoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor.

Healthy lifestyle behaviors are major predictors of mental wellbeing during COVID-19 pandemic confinement: A study on adult Arabs in higher educational institutions

“…For example, anxiety is the biggest mental challenge people face today, followed by their inability to work remotely and feelings isolation from their social life. It is also has become imperative to pay attention to other lifestyle factors that can enhance mental wellbeing such as sleep quality, dietary behaviors, physical activity, sitting time and sedentary life [ 8 , 9 ].…”

“…These were imposed by several governments and were reported to be “very effective” for people who choose to stay indoors [ 8 ]. However, home confinement, and curfews are a cause of concern as they have impacted physical activity (PA), eating behaviors, and mental health of the people globally [ 9 ].…”

Anxiety levels during a second local COVID-19 pandemic breakout among quarantined people: A cross sectional survey in China

“…One recent review reported negative psychological effects and longer quarantine time was a stressor ( Brooks et al, 2020 ). There are a growing number of studies about the impact of social quarantine on anxiety on the general population of different countries ( Campos JADB et al,2020 ; Pieh C et al, 2020 ; Rossi R et al,2020 ). A recent meta-analysis showed compelling evidence for adverse mental health effects of isolation and quarantine, in particular depression, anxiety, stress-related disorders ( Jonathan H et al,2020 ).…”

University Student’s Lifestyle Changes During COVID-19 Lockdown: A Spanish Cross-Sectional Survey.

“…The calculation of sample size and power were performed while using Sample Size Calculator Qualtrics (https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/calculating-sample-size/), as previously reported in other studies (31,32).…”