2010
DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.15.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Waist Circumference, Waist Hip Ratio and Body Mass Index as Predictors of Obesity in Adult Nigerians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Age-related differences in waist-hip ratio in both men and women were also reported by [20]. From Tables 4 and 5 positive correlations was observed between body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio in men and women [21] reported in his study that only in male were waist-hip ratio and body mass index significantly correlated. So, relationship between other parameters such as; BMI vs. WHR and WHR vs. WC were not statistically correlated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Age-related differences in waist-hip ratio in both men and women were also reported by [20]. From Tables 4 and 5 positive correlations was observed between body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio in men and women [21] reported in his study that only in male were waist-hip ratio and body mass index significantly correlated. So, relationship between other parameters such as; BMI vs. WHR and WHR vs. WC were not statistically correlated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The result shows that waist-hip-ratio increases with increase in age in both sexes. Age-related differences in waist-hip ratio in both men and women were also reported by Shimokata H et al 20 From Tables 4 & 5 positive correlations was observed between body mass index, waist circumference and waisthip ratio in men and women 21 reported in his study that only in male were waist-hip ratio and body mass index significantly correlated. So, relationship between other parameters such as; BMI vs. WHR and WHR vs. WC were not statistically correlated.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…14 Lingkar pinggang memiliki sensitifitas 83,6% dan spesifisitas 82,5%, sedangkan RLPP yang memiliki sensitifitas 70% dan spesifisitas 64,1%, sehingga lingkar pinggang dan RLPP merupakan indikator status gizi yang sensitif untuk menilai obesitas sentral. 15,16 Lingkar pinggang merupakan salah satu indikator yang lebih sensitif dalam menilai distribusi lemak di tubuh terutama yang berada di dinding abdomen. 17 Hasil penelitian di Jakarta menunjukkan status gizi mahasiswa perokok dan non perokok yang tergolong normal sebesar 49,1%, sedangkan penelitian di India menunjukkan perokok aktif yang memiliki status gizi underweight sebesar 36,1%.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified