2017
DOI: 10.5455/ijlr.20170821034949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Ultrasonographic Testicular Biometry with Body Weight, Scrotal Circumference in Pre and Post Pubertal Osmanabadi Bucks

Abstract: 49 ± 0.21, 3.10 ± 0.13, 3.06 ± 0.12 cm to 6.16 ± 0.20, 3.44 ± 0.12, 3.31 ± 0.11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scrotal circumference was measured using a flexible measuring tape (cm) (Ahmed et al, 2005;Memon et al, 2007). The testes are gently and firmly pushed into the scrotal sac and the circumference around the middle of the testicles was measured (Kumbhar et al, 2017). The scrotal length was measured as distance (cm) between the lower end and neck of the scrotum as described by Raji et al (2008).…”
Section: Testicular Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scrotal circumference was measured using a flexible measuring tape (cm) (Ahmed et al, 2005;Memon et al, 2007). The testes are gently and firmly pushed into the scrotal sac and the circumference around the middle of the testicles was measured (Kumbhar et al, 2017). The scrotal length was measured as distance (cm) between the lower end and neck of the scrotum as described by Raji et al (2008).…”
Section: Testicular Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%