2013
DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2013-0053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Udder and Teat Morphology to Milking Characteristics and Udder Health Determined by Ultrasonographic Examinations in Dairy Cows / Związek Między Morfologią Wymienia I Strzyków A Cechami Doju I Zdrowotnością Wymienia W Badaniach Usg Krów Mlecznych

Abstract: The aim of this study is to call attention to the possibility of using ultrasonography as a useful tool for the evaluation of morphological characteristics of the udder and teats in dairy cows in relation to milking characteristics and udder health. A total of 26 dairy cows of the Holstein breed in the first (n = 13) and second lactation (n = 13) were investigated with a linear array ultrasound probe. Recovery of the teat internal parameters after milking was determined by ultrasonographic scanning. Teat canal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The front teats canal diameter increased from 1.11 mm before milking to 1.21 mm after the end of milking (9%) while the rear teats canal diameter from 1.09 mm before milking to 1.19 mm after milking (9.1%) (Table 1, Figure 3). Szencziova et al (2013) stated an increase in the average diameter of the teat canal by about 17%. Higher value may be caused by a low number of cows in experiment (n = 25), parity, or stage of lactation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The front teats canal diameter increased from 1.11 mm before milking to 1.21 mm after the end of milking (9%) while the rear teats canal diameter from 1.09 mm before milking to 1.19 mm after milking (9.1%) (Table 1, Figure 3). Szencziova et al (2013) stated an increase in the average diameter of the teat canal by about 17%. Higher value may be caused by a low number of cows in experiment (n = 25), parity, or stage of lactation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values seem higher compared to results of Geidel and Graff (2001) who found extension of front teats of 17% on average and rear teats of about 24%. Based on the measurements in Holstein dairy cows, Szencziova et al (2013) reported an average enlargement of the teat canal by 2.41 mm (22%). Similar conclusions were also made by Stadnik et al (2010), who confirmed the extension of the front teat canal in Holstein dairy cows due to milking by 13.9%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk composition is affected in general by genotype (Stádník et al, 1999; K adlecová et al, 2014), feeding system and nutrition level (Rego et al, 2009), systems of milking (Bobić et al, 2013), morphology of teat and udder (Szencziová et al, 2013) as well as other factors. The milk fat is a key component of raw milk determining energy balance of cows (K adlecová et al, 2014) as well as processing, technological, and nutritional quality of milk (Ducháček et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capability of dairy cows to increase feed intake during the postpartum period could be predicted with respect to the polymorphism of selected genes (Kadlecová et al 2014a). Milk production increases in early lactation (Szencziová et al 2013) and despite simultaneously increased feed intake, the cow's metabolism goes through the negative energy balance (NEB) phase of lactation (Kadlecová et al 2014b). This standard course of the postpartum period of all dairy cows evokes body fat reserve degradation as an additional source of energy, concurrently followed by a decline in live weight (Řehák et al 2012), body condition score (BCS) (Stádník et al 2002;Ducháček et al 2012a) causing a simultaneous decrease of reproduction (Louda & Stádník 2000;Ducháček et al 2012b) and impairment of health (Vacek et al 2007), and/or changes in milk composition (Gellrich et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%