1988
DOI: 10.1177/001440298805400509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Temperament to Preschoolers' Interactions with Peers and Teachers

Abstract: Two groups of preschool children (9 handicapped, 9 nonhandicapped) were observed, with the focus on frequency of interactions with teachers and peers. Teachers rated temperaments of each child, using a derivation of the Thomas and Chess Teacher Temperament Scale, producing scores on task orientation, personal-social flexibility, and reactivity. Teachers rated handicapped children (compared with nonhandicapped) as 101V in task orientation and flexibility, and as underreactive or overreactive . For both groups o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
2
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
16
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding contradicts with the findings of the research by Keogh and Burstein (1988), which revealed that the frequency of teacher-student interactions was positively related to task orientation. Moreover, although it was not significant, task orientation was negatively correlated with all the interaction categories.…”
Section: Teacher-child Interactionscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This finding contradicts with the findings of the research by Keogh and Burstein (1988), which revealed that the frequency of teacher-student interactions was positively related to task orientation. Moreover, although it was not significant, task orientation was negatively correlated with all the interaction categories.…”
Section: Teacher-child Interactionscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…He and others suggested that this pattern ultimately contributes to a "poorness of fit" in both academic and social realms. 20,23,25,26,31 In our children with MM/SH, a cluster of "at risk" behavioral styles involved negative responses to new stimuli (low approach), to changes in routine (low adaptability), and to extraneous distractions (high distractibility) and the ability to maintain persistent focus (poor persistence). Studies indicate that teachers rated the combination of low persistence, low approach, and low adaptability as difficult to manage in nonaffected children with learning differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…21,22 In typically developing children, temperament characteristics have proved to be predictors of later academic achievement, quality of mother-child and teacher-child interactions, specific problem behaviors, and general health of the child. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Among children with developmental disabilities, variations in temperament characteristics may create challenges to the pediatrician and may cause confusion to parents as they try to interpret behaviors in their "at risk" child. The neurodevelopmental variations in MM, associated with ventricular, cortical, and limbic differences in anatomy and function, support the idea of potential important differences in the arena of temperament.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keogh and Burstein (1988) found that positive temperament characteristics were associated with increased peer interactions for preschoolers with developmental disabilities; however negative temperament characteristics were associated with higher frequency of teacher interactions. Low adaptability and low persistence have been related to the development of aggressive and disruptive behaviors in young children who were born prematurely (Schraeder, Heverly, & Rappaport, 1990).…”
Section: Research On Temperament and Children With Developmental Disamentioning
confidence: 89%