The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of serum imatinib trough level and response in CML patients: Long term follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other studies [15,19,20], trough plasma concentration of imatinib did not reflect clinical response in chronic CML. Our results showed higher imatinib levels in CCyR, but no significant difference was found.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to other studies [15,19,20], trough plasma concentration of imatinib did not reflect clinical response in chronic CML. Our results showed higher imatinib levels in CCyR, but no significant difference was found.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In patients who do not respond to initial imatinib treatment as expected, measurement of trough plasma concentration can assist in making decisions regarding dose increases. Blood level testing may also be helpful in other clinical scenarios: for example, when poor adherence or drug-drug interaction is suspected, or in case of unusually severe adverse reactions [14,15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25] Several studies have investigated whether the imatinib C 0 reflects the clinical response of patients taking imatinib, namely exposure-response relationships. 11,12,[20][21][22][25][26][27][28][29][30] In Japanese CML patients, we have reported that the imatinib C 0 was significantly higher in patients with a MMR than in those without a MMR; the mean values were 1107±594 ng/ mL and 873±529 ng/mL, respectively (p=0.002). 21) Picard et al first reported that a steady-state imatinib C 0 measured after at least 12 months of treatment with a standard imatinib dose correlated with the MMR, and the threshold for the imae-mail: m-miura@hos.akita-u.ac.jp tinib C 0 should be set above 1002 ng/mL.…”
Section: Imatinib Tdmmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…TDM, recently, has become an essential tool for the management of CML patients, particularly for patients taking imatinib [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], which efficacy threshold in terms of plasma concentrations is clearly defined. In order to manage primary or acquired resistance to imatinib, clinical studies using dasatinib or nilotinib as second line therapy or combination of therapies with different TKIs, in sequential or simultaneous administration, are currently under evaluation [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Sub-inhibitory intracellular drug concentrations, probably, and sequential treatment with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors promote the selection of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in CML patients [51][52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%