Relationship of Radiographic and Clinical Parameters With Hallux Valgus and Second Ray Pathology

Gribbin, Caitlin; Ellis, Scott J.; Nguyen, Joseph; Williamson, Emilie; Cody, Elizabeth

doi:10.1177/1071100716666562

Cited by 22 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, instead of following the “1 subject = 1 hand” approach, we observed wrists as independent entities. This approach is relatively common in neurology as well as in other specialties . On the basis of such references and our everyday clinical experience with patients who have CTS, we decided to use data on all available wrists instead of omitting valuable information by choosing only 1 wrist per patient.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This approach is relatively common in neurology 8,12,[27][28][29][30][31][32]35,38 as well as in other specialties. [39][40][41] On the basis of such references and our everyday clinical experience with patients who have CTS, we decided to use data on all available wrists instead of omitting valuable information by choosing only 1 wrist per patient. Other limitations of this study included the fact that the US examiner was not blinded to electrodiagnostic findings and patient symptoms, since most of the patients were referred from an electrodiagnostic laboratory to a US laboratory for a clinical suspicion of CTS, and the same physician performing the US examination also gathered the clinical data.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of Multiple Ultrasonographic Parameters in Confirmation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Ažman¹,

Hrabač

Demarin

2017

J of Ultrasound Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Multiple Ultrasonographic Parameters in Confirmation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Ažman¹,

Hrabač

Demarin

2017

J of Ultrasound Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…18 Yüklenmede anteroposterior ayak radyografisi ile ölçülen HVA, halluks valgus hastalarının tedavi kararında en önemli parametredir. 21 Hâlen, 40°den büyük deformiteler için cerrahi tedavi tercih edilirken, 20-40° arasındaki açılar için konservatif tedavi önerilmektedir. 21 Bu çalışmada, HVA'da değişiklik görülmeyen bir hasta dışında, tüm hastalarda HVA'nın 9,9°'den fazla değiştiği saptandı.…”

Section: Hasta Seçi̇mi̇unclassified

“…21 Hâlen, 40°den büyük deformiteler için cerrahi tedavi tercih edilirken, 20-40° arasındaki açılar için konservatif tedavi önerilmektedir. 21 Bu çalışmada, HVA'da değişiklik görülmeyen bir hasta dışında, tüm hastalarda HVA'nın 9,9°'den fazla değiştiği saptandı. Çalışmada gözlemlenen bu değişim, kinezyolojik bantlamanın az da olsa HVA üzerinde azaltıcı bir etkiye sahip olduğunu gösterdi.…”

Section: Hasta Seçi̇mi̇unclassified

Is Kinesiologic Taping an Effective Method in Palliative Treatment of Hallux Valgus? A Retrospective Evaluation

Kaçmaz¹,

Erkuş²,

Basa³

et al. 2020

Turkiye Klinikleri J Health Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…X‐ray measurement of the foot is important for understanding the pathological changes of hallux valgus, and developing a surgical plan. X‐ray examination of the foot is critical for further summarizing the pathological changes of hallux valgus and developing a surgical plan. At present, the X‐ray measurement for hallux valgus is generally conducted with weight‐bearing of the foot.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Single‐Foot Centered and Double‐Foot Centered X‐ray Projection on Hallux Valgus Measurement

Bao

Zhang

2019

Orthopaedic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To investigate whether use of single‐foot centered and double‐foot centered weight‐bearing X‐rays has an impact on the relevant indicators of hallux valgus. Methods A total of 55 female patients from the Department of Ankle Surgery of Beijing Tongren Hospital with hallux valgus (110 feet) were collected from September to December 2015. The age of these patients ranged from 18 to 43 years, with an average age of 47.9 ± 8.5 years. All selected patients fit the diagnostic criteria of hallux valgus and had weight‐bearing single foot centered and double foot centered radiographs taken. During the projection, all patients were instructed to stand on the X‐ray box, with the knee joint straightened and legs perpendicular to the floor. The projection center of the single foot was directed at the lateral part of the scaphoid bone of the foot, while the projection center was directed at the position between the scaphoid bones of both feet for the double‐foot shooting. The hallux valgus angle (HAV), the intermetatarsal angle between the first and second metatarsals (IMA), the intermetatarsal angle between the first and fifth metatarsals (IM1‐5), and the metatarsal adduction angle (MAA) were measured and examined. The difference between these two shooting conditions was compared and analyzed. Results The differences in X‐ray measurement results (IMA, HAV, IM1‐5, and MMA) between different measures for the same patient were not statistically significant. The values of HAV, IMA, IM1‐5, and MAA are common indexes for evaluating hallux valgus. The average IMA was 15.9° for single‐foot centered and 14.1° for double‐foot centered X‐rays. The average HAV was 30.2° for single‐foot centered and 29.7° for double‐foot centered X‐rays. The average IM1‐5 was 31.1° for single‐foot centered and 29.7° for double‐foot centered X‐rays. The average of metatarsal adduction angle was 13.8° for single‐foot centered and 14.1° for double‐foot centered X‐rays. The differences between single‐foot centered and double‐foot centered X‐rays were statistically significant in terms of the measurement index (P < 0.05). In addition, compared with double‐foot centered weight‐bearing X‐rays, the focus of single‐foot centered X‐rays was located on the lateral part of the scaphoid bone of the foot, and the ray was closer to the vertical foot in the single‐foot centered weight‐bearing X‐ray. Conclusion When the weight‐bearing position and projection distance are the same, the single‐foot centered weight‐bearing X‐ray is more effective in evaluating the severity of hallux valgus compared with the double‐foot centered weight‐bearing X‐ray.

show abstract

Relationship of Radiographic and Clinical Parameters With Hallux Valgus and Second Ray Pathology

Abstract: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Cited by 22 publications

References 22 publications

Use of Multiple Ultrasonographic Parameters in Confirmation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Use of Multiple Ultrasonographic Parameters in Confirmation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Is Kinesiologic Taping an Effective Method in Palliative Treatment of Hallux Valgus? A Retrospective Evaluation

Effects of Single‐Foot Centered and Double‐Foot Centered X‐ray Projection on Hallux Valgus Measurement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About