Abstract:Alcohol and smoking frequently co-occur and alcohol is a primary trigger for smoking behavior and relapse back to smoking. This study examined whether several indices of alcohol use behavior and consequences of use would be associated with changes in implicit alcohol-approach versus implicit cigarette-approach cognitions under cigarette deprived and non-deprived cognitions in a 109 smokers who drank at risky or non-risky levels. An Implicit Association Task (IAT) measured how quickly respondents paired alcohol… Show more
“…Previous research from different fields has been trying to link implicit and explicit attitudes to actual behavior (43)(44)(45), with moderate success. Until today, it seems difficult to explain the gap between people's attitudes and actual behavior (46).…”
Many determinants leading to the use of different coercive measures in psychiatry have been widely studied and it seems that staff attitudes play a crucial role when it comes to the decision-making process about using coercion. However, research results about staff attitudes and their role in the use of coercive measures are inconsistent. This might be due to a focus on self-report studies asking for explicit answers, which involves the risk of bias. This study aimed to expand research on this topic by examining the impact of explicit and implicit staff attitudes on the use of coercive measures in clinical practice. In addition, the influence of gender, profession (nurses, psychiatrists), and years of professional experience as well as their influence on staff attitudes were examined. An adaption of the implicit association measure, the Go/No-Go Association Task (GNAT), with the target category coercion and distracter stimuli describing work load, as well as the explicit questionnaire Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS) was completed by staff (N = 149) on 13 acute psychiatric units in 6 hospitals. Data on coercive measures as well as the total number of treated cases for each unit was collected. Results showed that there was no association between staff's implicit and explicit attitudes toward coercion, and neither measure was correlated with the local frequency of coercive measures. ANOVAs showed a significant difference of the GNAT result for the factor gender (F = 9.32, p = 0.003), demonstrating a higher tendency to justify coercion among female staff members (M = −0.23, SD = ±0.35) compared to their male colleagues (M = −0.41, SD = ±0.31). For the SACS, a significant difference was found for the factor profession (F = 7.58, p = 0.007), with nurses (M = 2.79, SD = ±1.40) showing a more positive attitude to the use of coercion than psychiatrists (M = 2.15, SD = ±1.11). No significant associations were found regarding the extent of professional experience. Results indicate a complex interaction between implicit and explicit decision-making processes dependent on specific contexts. We propose future research to include primers for more context-related outcomes. Furthermore, differences in gender suggest a need to direct attention toward occupational safety and possible feelings of anxiety in the workplace, especially for female staff members.
“…Previous research from different fields has been trying to link implicit and explicit attitudes to actual behavior (43)(44)(45), with moderate success. Until today, it seems difficult to explain the gap between people's attitudes and actual behavior (46).…”
Many determinants leading to the use of different coercive measures in psychiatry have been widely studied and it seems that staff attitudes play a crucial role when it comes to the decision-making process about using coercion. However, research results about staff attitudes and their role in the use of coercive measures are inconsistent. This might be due to a focus on self-report studies asking for explicit answers, which involves the risk of bias. This study aimed to expand research on this topic by examining the impact of explicit and implicit staff attitudes on the use of coercive measures in clinical practice. In addition, the influence of gender, profession (nurses, psychiatrists), and years of professional experience as well as their influence on staff attitudes were examined. An adaption of the implicit association measure, the Go/No-Go Association Task (GNAT), with the target category coercion and distracter stimuli describing work load, as well as the explicit questionnaire Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS) was completed by staff (N = 149) on 13 acute psychiatric units in 6 hospitals. Data on coercive measures as well as the total number of treated cases for each unit was collected. Results showed that there was no association between staff's implicit and explicit attitudes toward coercion, and neither measure was correlated with the local frequency of coercive measures. ANOVAs showed a significant difference of the GNAT result for the factor gender (F = 9.32, p = 0.003), demonstrating a higher tendency to justify coercion among female staff members (M = −0.23, SD = ±0.35) compared to their male colleagues (M = −0.41, SD = ±0.31). For the SACS, a significant difference was found for the factor profession (F = 7.58, p = 0.007), with nurses (M = 2.79, SD = ±1.40) showing a more positive attitude to the use of coercion than psychiatrists (M = 2.15, SD = ±1.11). No significant associations were found regarding the extent of professional experience. Results indicate a complex interaction between implicit and explicit decision-making processes dependent on specific contexts. We propose future research to include primers for more context-related outcomes. Furthermore, differences in gender suggest a need to direct attention toward occupational safety and possible feelings of anxiety in the workplace, especially for female staff members.
“…[32, 54, 55•]), but importantly these were the studies that did not observe an approach bias for the disorder-related substance. Finally, the experimental studies highlighted a number of moderators that strengthened approach bias and its relationship with consumption behaviour, such as relevant task instructions [48, 80••], negative or positive affect [64,65,66••], low cognitive load [68], hunger [78] and withdrawal from other substances [71]. Together, these findings support the main premises of dual-process models of behaviour, namely, that automatically activated tendencies predict behaviour when the reflective system is relatively weak (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge for the understanding of automatically activated approach-avoidance tendencies is co-morbidity. Indeed, research examined in this review highlighted that tobacco and alcohol use were interrelated [35,71]. Thus, another direction for future research is the concurrent assessment of approach-avoidance biases and related behaviours for multiple substances.…”
Section: Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Research has also examined the moderating role of substance use in the relationship between approach bias and consumption behaviour. Cohn et al [71] found that approach bias toward alcohol, but not cigarette cues, predicted proportion of heavy drinking days during nicotine deprivation. Their findings suggest that cigarette withdrawal may increase motivation to drink, but not smoke.…”
Purpose of Review Automatic approach-avoidance tendencies drive excessive intake of drugs and unhealthy food. Dual-process models of behaviour propose that strong approach biases predict excessive intake when reflective processes are weak. Consistent with theory, early findings indicated that approach biases predicted excessive use of drugs, including alcohol and tobacco. Given that reviews on approach bias for appetitive substances are lacking, the current review aimed to synthesise the recent findings on automatic approach biases across three of the most commonly assessed substances: alcohol, food and tobacco. Recent Findings The findings suggest that approach biases exist for a range of substances, are mostly stronger in clinical samples than healthy controls and predict consumption behaviour, albeit under certain conditions. Summary Approach biases for appetitive substances are related to excessive consumption in line with theoretical premises. Further longitudinal research is needed, particularly in the domains of tobacco and food, to determine the prediction of consumption of these substances over time. Nevertheless, the findings highlight a continued need for approach bias modification techniques aimed at changing this underlying mechanism.
“…To our knowledge, this is the only study that has examined the effects of prolonged nicotine reduction (i.e., 6 weeks) on alcohol drinking. Past studies of acute nicotine deprivation or abstinence have reported inconsistent effects on alcohol craving and drinking behavior (Cooney et al, 2003, Colby et al, 2004, Cohn et al, 2017, Palfai et al, 2000), but these studies may not closely model what is expected to occur in the marketplace as a result of new FDA product standards – a gradual reduction in nicotine content in cigarettes. As we anticipate changes in nicotine content in cigarettes, it is now time to reflect on how alcohol-focused researchers, clinicians, and policy makers, who have had a long-standing focus on harm reduction, can prepare for upcoming changes in the nicotine-focused harm reduction regulatory framework for tobacco.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.