2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Leishmania-specific IgG levels and IgG avidity with parasite density and clinical signs in canine leishmaniasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency towards higher co-positivity percentages in symptomatic dogs compared with asymptomatic dogs, which was consistently observed in this study, agrees with the literature for several diagnostic tests 2,3,[34][35][36][37][38][39] . Depending on the assay, this may be related to higher antibody titers or to higher parasite loads in clinically ill dogs 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The tendency towards higher co-positivity percentages in symptomatic dogs compared with asymptomatic dogs, which was consistently observed in this study, agrees with the literature for several diagnostic tests 2,3,[34][35][36][37][38][39] . Depending on the assay, this may be related to higher antibody titers or to higher parasite loads in clinically ill dogs 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Many studies [4, 5] report that high levels of antibodies production are associated with the presence of clinical signs such as epistaxis, proteinuria, polyuria, polydipsia, uveitis, and skin ulcers because of the deposition of soluble immune complexes in organs and tissues [3, 6]. Several authors [5, 7, 8] evaluated the profile of anti- Leishmania antibodies in dogs with different clinical forms of visceral leishmaniasis using methods not easily obtainable in clinical practice. The immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) is one of the most commonly used techniques [9] for detection of anti- Leishmania antibodies and is recommended by World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) as the reference serological method [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reis et al reported increase in IgG1 levels associated with the asymptomatic clinical presentation and poor tissue parasitic load, while the symptomatic clinical form would be characterized by high parasitic load and high levels of anti-Leishmania IgG, IgG2, IgM, IgA, and IgE [73,74]. Teixeira-Neto et al reported similar results, with symptomatic dogs demonstrating high levels of anti-Leishmania IgG2 antibodies, whereas the asymptomatic showed higher IgG1 titles, when compared to IgG2 [93]. Production of IFN-γ is associated with the production of IgG1 [94], which may indicate a Th1 response profile.…”
Section: Lymphocytesmentioning
confidence: 90%