2001
DOI: 10.3133/ofr01502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of faults in basin sediments to the gravity and magnetic expression of their underlying fault systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because CDTs based on airborne TEM data do not see into bedrock below basin fill, the occurrence of mineralization in the bedrock concealed by basin fill cannot be ascertained. A comparison of the basin-fill/bedrock contact between Baldyga's (2001) cross section and CDT 8 in figure A2-2 shows several differences. First, the depth to bedrock is overestimated on the CDTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Because CDTs based on airborne TEM data do not see into bedrock below basin fill, the occurrence of mineralization in the bedrock concealed by basin fill cannot be ascertained. A comparison of the basin-fill/bedrock contact between Baldyga's (2001) cross section and CDT 8 in figure A2-2 shows several differences. First, the depth to bedrock is overestimated on the CDTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same fault appears in CDT 8, and the bedrock is offset in the same direction as in the cross section, but the offset in the CDT is less than 100 m and the upthrown bedrock block is about 400 m deep. Two lines (A2-4a and A2-4b) in figure A2-4 are drawn between Baldyga's (2001) cross section and the CDT. Just east of line A2-4a in Baldyga's cross section is an upthrown bedrock block at about 250 m depth; the same feature is visible in CDT 11 at about 400 m depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations