Relationship matters: a qualitative study of medical students' experiences in a learner-driven research program in South Korea

Abstract

Background Although research experience is important for medical students, it is difficult to develop research skills only through a formal curriculum. To develop research programs that address the authentic needs of students and align with the entirety of the medical school curriculum, a learner-centered approach may be more effective than an instructor-centered approach. This study investigates medical student perspectives on factors that help them develop research competency. Methods Hanyang University College of Medicine in South Korea operates the Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) as a supplement to its formal curriculum. Semi-structured interviews were held with 18 students (20 cases) in the program, and qualitative content analysis was performed using the software tool MAXQDA20. Results The findings are discussed in relation to three domains: learner engagement, instructional design, and program development. The students were more engaged when they perceived the program as a new experience, had prior research experience, wanted to make a good impression, and felt a sense of contribution. In terms of instructional design, they positively participated in research when their supervisors respected them, set clear tasks, provided constructive feedback, and invited them into the research community. In particular, the students highly valued relationships with their professors, and these relationships served not only as a main motivating factor in their research participation but also affected their college lives and careers. Conclusions The longitudinal relationship between students and professors has newly emerged in the Korean context as a factor that strengthens student engagement in research and the complementary relationship between formal curriculum and MSTP was highlighted to encourage student engagement in research.

Enhancing undergraduate research talents: the role of tutors in dental basic research education

“…Teaching with feedback appears to be a promising solution based on the challenges posed by the lack of mentorship, where only 48.21% tutors provided more than 15-min mentorship per week, and each tutor was responsible for multiple grades of students. High-quality feedback between tutors and students is considered to be the students’ motivation to continuous implementation of research project, and to promote students’ progress in scientific research ( 26 ). When learners have a clear understanding of what they are being assessed on and regularly receive explicit feedback from others regarding their progress and abilities, they are more likely to provide more effective responses ( 27 ).…”

“…Score: mean scores of each item of the factor; n: number of the related items of each factor; SD: standard deviation.project, and to promote students' progress in scientific research(26). When learners have a clear understanding of what they are being assessed on and regularly receive explicit feedback from others regarding their progress and abilities, they are more likely to provide more effective responses(27).…”

Analyzing the efficacy of a decade-long endeavor: extracurricular medical research training amidst the turmoil of Syria

“…The current study also proves that attending research-related workshops as an independent factor has a positive additional value on research conduction. This can be attributed to the development of leadership and time management skills through extracurricular activities (30) and the possibility to engage more effectively in the research community during such trainings (31). The extracurricular workshops in Syria were also suggested to help in establishing research networks that foster research knowledge and participation, in addition to enhancing students' understanding of research materials (10,20).…”

The Expediency of Including an Individual Scientific Work as a Mandatory Component in the Educational and Professional Program of Medicine

“…Дослідження щодо необхідності включення елементів дослідження у програму підготовки здобувачів освіти медичного профілю також проводилось у Південній Кореї [5]. За даними дослідників тривалі колегіальні (відносно проведення досліджень) відносини між здобувачами вищої освіти медичного профілю та викладачами являються фактором, що посилює участь здобувачів освіти у дослідницькій діяльності, а взаємодоповнюючий зв'язок між офіційною навчальною програмою та додатковою програмою позитивно вплинув на якість освіти [5]. Проте програма, що була запропонована корейськими вченими також як і американська є вибірковою та не охоплює весь контингент здобувачів освіти.…”