Relationship-focused or deal-focused? Building interpersonal bonds within B2B relationships

Abstract

Purpose There is a research gap regarding frameworks identifying the specific activities and resources used by companies to build and enhance social ties between them and business actors. The purpose of this paper is to identify those activities and resources and propose a model of them for referring to successive stages of business relationship-building. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research was conducted in the form of 16 semi-structured in-depth individual interviews in four companies operating in Poland, representing the construction, chemical, alcoholic beverages and automotive industries. Findings Resources and activities used by companies to build and strengthen interpersonal bonds within business relationships may be categorised according to the dimension of relationship-focused (RF) vs deal-focused (DF) approach. In the companies analysed, the RF approach appeared dominant, while some symptoms of changes towards a DF approach were observed. Research limitations/implications The proposed model of resources and activities used in companies at successive stages of business relationship-building extends the understanding of how high-quality relationships are built. The study is exploratory in nature and aims to inspire further in-depth analyses, including cross-cultural comparisons. Practical implications The paper helps managers in their day-to-day management of B2B relationships. It provides particular guidelines for business people seeking a potential business partner in Poland and other countries with a communist past. Originality/value The paper’s originality results from combining the behavioural approach to B2B relationships with the concept of the RF vs DF approach. The latter concept is based on the experience and observations of its author and, as such, has so far received limited attention in the literature.

Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems

“…Competitive advantages accrue on the part of those involved in innovation ecosystems as opposed to those outside of innovation ecosystems. Collaborative advantages are rooted in relational rents (Dyer and Singh 1998) as well as in social relationships of manegers (Glińska-Neweś et al 2018), and are exploited under relational strategies (Zakrzewska-Bielawska 2019). It is emphasized that they encourage radical innovations (Bouncken et al 2018) as well as innovations of business models (Bouncken and Fredrich 2016).…”

Inter-Organizational Collaboration on Projects Supporting Sustainable Development Goals: The Company Perspective

“…The subject of inter-organizational relationships has been extensively described in management studies since the 1980s at least. There are a significant number of publications presenting many aspects of such relationships in detail, but most refer to business-to-business collaboration [20][21][22][23][24]. Consequently, there is a wealth of guidance and frameworks for analyzing and understanding how the partners in such B2B partnerships might interact, and what the potential positive and negative outcomes might be for each partner [23,34,36].…”

“…Notwithstanding the rich literature on companies' contributions to SD [4,9,[17][18][19] and on companies' collaborations with other types of organizations (chiefly with other enterprises to achieve business goals [20][21][22][23][24]), there are fewer publications dealing with the issue of inter-organizational collaboration in relation to company engagement in projects supporting SD goals [25]. Of the research areas within this topic, the one most studied and described in the literature to date has been company-NGO collaboration on such projects [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”

“…The methodological foundation for our analysis was the ARA (Activities-Resources-Actors) model developed by Håkansson and Snehota [20], as one of the various frameworks for studying and explaining the nature of inter-organizational collaboration [23,26,27,[34][35][36]. It was selected for three main reasons.…”

Imitation in immigrant entrepreneurship: an analytical framework

“…As a preliminary step, to make our theoretical consideration sounder, we used face validation and content validation. Content validation and face validation, although typical for quantitative research, can also be used in qualitative studies (Glinska-Newes et al , 2018; Colman and Rouzies, 2019). During the content validation phase, concepts and categories were clarified and further streamlined based on existing studies in the field of immigrant entrepreneurship to refine our main construct: immigrant entrepreneurs' imitation.…”