2015
DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2015.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship building in empowering leadership processes: A test of mediation and moderation

Abstract: The direct positive relationship between empowering leadership and subordinate empowerment is well established. However, leader–member exchange (LMX) research, which concerns a leader’s relationship-building with subordinates in a work unit, suggests that the direct leader empowering–subordinate empowerment association may be more complex than understood in the current literature. Accordingly, this study examined LMX theory-based mediation and moderation processes occurring between empowering leadership and su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measure has four multi‐item subscales which are (1) enhancing the meaningfulness of work (sample item: ‘My manager helps me understand how my job fits into the bigger picture'), (2) fostering participation in decision‐making (sample item: ‘My manager makes many decisions together with me'), (3) expressing confidence in high performance (sample item: ‘My manager believes that I can handle demanding tasks'), and (4) providing autonomy from bureaucratic constraints (sample item: ‘My manager allows me to do my job my way'). Since the four subdimensions are highly correlated with one another and share a common theme of empowering leadership, following previous research (e.g., Humborstad & Kuvaas, ; Kwak & Jackson, ; Lorinkova & Perry, ), scores across the subdimensions were averaged to form a single empowering leadership score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure has four multi‐item subscales which are (1) enhancing the meaningfulness of work (sample item: ‘My manager helps me understand how my job fits into the bigger picture'), (2) fostering participation in decision‐making (sample item: ‘My manager makes many decisions together with me'), (3) expressing confidence in high performance (sample item: ‘My manager believes that I can handle demanding tasks'), and (4) providing autonomy from bureaucratic constraints (sample item: ‘My manager allows me to do my job my way'). Since the four subdimensions are highly correlated with one another and share a common theme of empowering leadership, following previous research (e.g., Humborstad & Kuvaas, ; Kwak & Jackson, ; Lorinkova & Perry, ), scores across the subdimensions were averaged to form a single empowering leadership score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team leaders’ age, gender, education, and tenure were our primary control variables. Also, we controlled for team size because team size may influence the interaction and dynamics among team members (Kwak & Jackson, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empowering leadership has been suggested as the leadership style that promotes learning through the creation of a learning culture (Chang & Chuang, ). In empowering leadership, the leader encourages employees through his or her behavior, which allows employees to experience higher levels of connectedness, appreciation, and motivation (Kwak & Jackson, ). For example, an empowered team is able to increase knowledge‐sharing among team members and, in turn, increase the team's performance (J. Lee, Lee, & Park, ).…”
Section: Review Of the Literature And Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%