2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Varicocele, a cause of male infertility, occurs in nearly 40% of infertile males. It has been postulated that varicoceles may cause sperm DNA damage. Sperm DNA integrity has been recognized as one of the important determinants of normal fertilization and embryo growth in natural and assisted conception. Eighty-three human studies were identified after an extensive literature search involving the role of varicoceles in sperm DNA damage. Of the 83 studies, 12 were selected that measured similar types of reactive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
127
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intake of oral antioxidants (6,7), varicocele repair (8), and the use of recurrent ejaculations before fertilization (9,10) alone or combined with micromanipulation-based sperm selection techniques such as magnetic cell sorting (11,12), physiological ICSI (13), or intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (14)(15)(16) have been attempted with varying success rates to decrease SDF. Yet none of these interventions, alone or combined, have been unequivocally proven to be of clinical value to bypass the potential detrimental effect of abnormal SDF on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intake of oral antioxidants (6,7), varicocele repair (8), and the use of recurrent ejaculations before fertilization (9,10) alone or combined with micromanipulation-based sperm selection techniques such as magnetic cell sorting (11,12), physiological ICSI (13), or intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (14)(15)(16) have been attempted with varying success rates to decrease SDF. Yet none of these interventions, alone or combined, have been unequivocally proven to be of clinical value to bypass the potential detrimental effect of abnormal SDF on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of varicocele repair using microsurgical techniques among men with azoospermia was predominant in this study largely promoted semen quality and clinical outcomes of couples who underwent ARTs. This result was previously demonstrated in some studies [23,25,[30][31][32]. Moreover, several studies reported the effectiveness of IUI or ICSI to increase clinical outcomes [30,33], however Baker et al [12] found that high DNA fragmentation index (>30) help to achieve spontaneous pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This result was previously demonstrated in some studies [23,25,[30][31][32]. Moreover, several studies reported the effectiveness of IUI or ICSI to increase clinical outcomes [30,33], however Baker et al [12] found that high DNA fragmentation index (>30) help to achieve spontaneous pregnancy. Thoroughly, spontaneous pregnancy should remain the ultimate standard for evaluating the succeed management of male infertility due to varicocele treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In our study, DNA fragmentation is significantly more important in patients with varicocele. Wang meta-analysis [29] including 416 patients (240 varicocele and 176 controls) in seven studies showed the same tendency and there was a significant decrease after surgery. We find the same tendency in Kadioglu study [13] [36]) and even induction of spermatogenesis in case of azoospermia [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The new event is the fact that in that pathology DNA fragmentation is a reversible lesion after surgery ([13] [29]). This is as a new argument to support the clinical utility of this test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%