2015
DOI: 10.4103/1118-8561.152151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of placental thickness and estimated fetal weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in agreement with study of Adeyekun & Ikubor [9] as they reported that study subjects were 29.1 ± 4.9 years. The mean maternal weight was 71.4 ± 13.6 kg and mean height was 1.6 ± 0.5 m. Nagpal et al [16] found that, mean age of their study population was 23.1 ± 3.02 years.…”
Section: Disucssionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are in agreement with study of Adeyekun & Ikubor [9] as they reported that study subjects were 29.1 ± 4.9 years. The mean maternal weight was 71.4 ± 13.6 kg and mean height was 1.6 ± 0.5 m. Nagpal et al [16] found that, mean age of their study population was 23.1 ± 3.02 years.…”
Section: Disucssionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are supported by study of Adeyekun & Ikubor [9] as they reported that the mean values of placental thickness [PT] and EFW throughout gestation were 35.5 ± 7.0 mm and 1555.0 ± 1004 g; respectively. Nagpal et al [16] reported that, at 32 and 36 weeks, mean placental thickness were 33.45 ± 1.62 and 35.7 ± 2.08 mm respectively.…”
Section: Disucssionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study it was found that, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between sonographic placenta thickness and foetal weight yielding a Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of 0.902 for second trimester and 0.856 for third trimester within a P value of 0.001. This is in accordance with other documented Nigerian studies conducted by Abu and colleagues 31 and that carried out by Adeyekun et al 32 It is also in consonance with the study conducted by Maryam Afrakhteh et al 33 with 250 pregnant women (in Tajrish, Tehran, Iran) and Daskalakis et…”
Section: Relationship Between Fetal Weight and Placental Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 92%