2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(03)00155-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the widths of supercooled liquid regions and bond parameters of Mg-based bulk metallic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
147
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A correlation between the electronegativity difference and atomic size with DT x values was also reported by Fang et al 29,30 They showed that DT x values are proportional to three parameters: the electronegativity difference, the atomic size and the valence electron difference, and a good correlation between calculated and experimental DT x values were described for Fe-, Pd-, and Mg-based alloys. Considering that the larger the DT x value, the higher the critical diameter for amorphization, we can say that the La 56 Al 26.5 Ni 17.5 alloy presents the best GFA in this system.…”
Section: -5supporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A correlation between the electronegativity difference and atomic size with DT x values was also reported by Fang et al 29,30 They showed that DT x values are proportional to three parameters: the electronegativity difference, the atomic size and the valence electron difference, and a good correlation between calculated and experimental DT x values were described for Fe-, Pd-, and Mg-based alloys. Considering that the larger the DT x value, the higher the critical diameter for amorphization, we can say that the La 56 Al 26.5 Ni 17.5 alloy presents the best GFA in this system.…”
Section: -5supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, much attention has been devoted in the past few years to develop better criteria to predict the best glass-forming composition(s) for different alloy systems or groups of systems. Some of these criteria are based on the electronic structure, 22 the formation enthalpy of amorphous and crystalline phases, 23,24 topological instability or destabilization of the host crystalline lattice, [25][26][27] the electronegativity difference, 25,[28][29][30] calculation of the liquidus temperature based on the computer calculation of phase diagrams (CALPHAD) technique 23 and structural models. 23,31,32 However, so far there is no universal model that can predict new amorphous compositions and, in fact, many researchers are presently evaluating the connection of the different criteria to refine and improve their forecast and to obtain a better agreement with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For HEAs, in which there are no clear solvent or solute components, the formulation of the Hume-Rothery parameters requires modification. For δ, the following expression has been employed: 203,270 …”
Section: Phase Prediction and Alloy Selection In Heasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metallic glass compositions were designed based on the synergic effect of topological instability, the λ-criterion, and the difference in the electronegativity of the elements 6,7 , combined with the average distribution of the chemical elements in the alloy. This criterion is strongly related with the efficient packing of atoms to form an icosahedral structure 8,9 . Close packing is a general criterion of packing efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%