1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00620507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the two-carrier model and the superconductor-semiconductor composite model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Markiewicz had based an electron-hole interpretation of the DC Hall effect on the peculiar assumption that the hole component of conductivity scales with the measured conductivity, which is unverified [24]. Several other authors have proposed interpretations in terms of two-band models [4], including where the signs of the carriers need not be opposite [25][26][27], percolation models [28], and single band models with variations in mobility [29]. Theoretical explanations that were advanced include the doped Mott insulator [30], Luttinger liquid theory [31], phenomenology of two transport relaxation times [32], and k-space variation or anisotropy in scattering rate [33,34,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markiewicz had based an electron-hole interpretation of the DC Hall effect on the peculiar assumption that the hole component of conductivity scales with the measured conductivity, which is unverified [24]. Several other authors have proposed interpretations in terms of two-band models [4], including where the signs of the carriers need not be opposite [25][26][27], percolation models [28], and single band models with variations in mobility [29]. Theoretical explanations that were advanced include the doped Mott insulator [30], Luttinger liquid theory [31], phenomenology of two transport relaxation times [32], and k-space variation or anisotropy in scattering rate [33,34,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%