2009
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2-725-2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the NO<sub>2</sub> photolysis frequency and the solar global irradiance

Abstract: Abstract. Representative values of the atmospheric NO 2 photolysis frequency j (NO 2 ) are required for the adequate calculation and interpretation of NO and NO 2 concentrations and exchange fluxes near the surface. Direct measurements of j (NO 2 ) at ground level are often not available in field studies. In most cases, modeling approaches involving complex radiative transfer calculations are used to estimate j (NO 2 ) and other photolysis frequencies for air chemistry studies. However, important input paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NO 2 photolysis frequencies j (NO 2 ) were measured by filter radiometers (Meteorologie consult, Königstein, Germany) on top of the scaffold, with an uncertainty of ±5 %. The HONO photolysis frequency (j (HONO)) was calculated by multiplying j (NO 2 ) with a factor of 0.175 (Trebs et al, 2009). By comparing different parameterizations (Kraus and Hofzumahaus, 1998;Trebs et al, 2009), the uncertainty for the calculation of j (HONO) was estimated to be 5 %.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NO 2 photolysis frequencies j (NO 2 ) were measured by filter radiometers (Meteorologie consult, Königstein, Germany) on top of the scaffold, with an uncertainty of ±5 %. The HONO photolysis frequency (j (HONO)) was calculated by multiplying j (NO 2 ) with a factor of 0.175 (Trebs et al, 2009). By comparing different parameterizations (Kraus and Hofzumahaus, 1998;Trebs et al, 2009), the uncertainty for the calculation of j (HONO) was estimated to be 5 %.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HONO photolysis frequency (j (HONO)) was calculated by multiplying j (NO 2 ) with a factor of 0.175 (Trebs et al, 2009). By comparing different parameterizations (Kraus and Hofzumahaus, 1998;Trebs et al, 2009), the uncertainty for the calculation of j (HONO) was estimated to be 5 %. The overall (4π ) photolysis frequency was calculated by increasing values of the downwelling radiation by 5 %, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for simplification with respect to the short computational time that is available in photochemical models, the photolysis frequencies are given with simple parameterizations (Roeth, 2002;Trebs et al, 2009). Thus, in the present paper, ratios of the photolysis frequency in the street and its value for the same atmospheric conditions, but with free horizon, are derived.…”
Section: J = F (λ) σ (λT ) (λT ) Dλmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameterized photolysis frequencies (Röth, 2002) are available only for undisturbed conditions with free horizon, since they are based on values of the global solar irradiance G, measured for such conditions (Trebs et al, 2009).…”
Section: Parameterization With the Global Irradiancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NO 2 photolysis rate was parameterized as a quadratic function of total solar radiation (Trebs et al, 2009). Using this method and scaling the result to match the values calculated using steady-state RO 2 concentrations during SOAS, we find that (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%