Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults

Abstract

BackgroundThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was developed to enable earlier detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) relative to familiar multi-domain tests like the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE). Clinicians need to better understand the relationship between MoCA and MMSE scores.MethodsFor this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 219 healthy control (HC), 299 MCI, and 100 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia cases from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)-GO/2 database to evaluate MMSE and MoCA score distributions and select MoCA values to capture early and late MCI cases. Stepwise variable selection in logistic regression evaluated relative value of four test domains for separating MCI from HC. Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) was evaluated as a strategy to separate dementia from MCI. Equi-percentile equating produced a translation grid for MoCA against MMSE scores. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses evaluated lower cutoff scores for capturing the most MCI cases.ResultsMost dementia cases scored abnormally, while MCI and HC score distributions overlapped on each test. Most MCI cases scored ≥17 on MoCA (96.3 %) and ≥24 on MMSE (98.3 %). The ceiling effect (28–30 points) for MCI and HC was less using MoCA (18.1 %) versus MMSE (71.4 %). MoCA and MMSE scores correlated most for dementia (r = 0.86; versus MCI r = 0.60; HC r = 0.43). Equi-percentile equating showed a MoCA score of 18 was equivalent to MMSE of 24. ROC analysis found MoCA ≥ 17 as the cutoff between MCI and dementia that emphasized high sensitivity (92.3 %) to capture MCI cases. The core and orientation domains in both tests best distinguished HC from MCI groups, whereas comprehension/executive function and attention/calculation were not helpful. Mean FAQ scores were significantly higher and a greater proportion had abnormal FAQ scores in dementia than MCI and HC.ConclusionsMoCA and MMSE were more similar for dementia cases, but MoCA distributes MCI cases across a broader score range with less ceiling effect. A cutoff of ≥17 on the MoCA may help capture early and late MCI cases; depending on the level of sensitivity desired, ≥18 or 19 could be used. Functional assessment can help exclude dementia cases. MoCA scores are translatable to the MMSE to facilitate comparison.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0103-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Brief Clinical Assessment of Cognitive Deficit with Impaired Daily Living Functioning in Parkinson’s Patients with and without Dementia

“…This result is consistent with previous observations that the MMSE is not sensitive to predict mild cognitive deficit [32] [27]. Furthermore, according to Trzepacz et al (2015) [33] MoCA test is slightly more sensitive to detect earlier symptoms of memory loss than MMSE. We found approximately 30% of PD patients whose MMSE score was normal but they showed significant low MoCA scores which indicate sensitivity of MoCA test as compare to MMSE.…”

Neurocognitive Impairment as Systemic Effects of COPD

“…The most used psychometric questionnaires are: the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), the Clock Drawing test, the Trail Making test (TMT) A, the TMT B, Memory Impairment Screen (MIS); Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) [74]. It is advisable to use a batery of tests, not a single one, to improve the result accuracy [75,76].…”

Screening of cognitive impairment in the old and old-old population with the 3-CT scale

“…Чувствительность и специфичность MMSE и МоСА в разных возрастных группах вариабельны и зависят от нейропсихологического профиля и уровня образования [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Кроме того, большин-ство шкал адаптировано к амбулаторной оценке и их использование в условиях стационара может быть затруднено.…”