2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-010-9315-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between the Geometric Parameters of Rock Fractures, the Size of Percolation Clusters and REV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing cell size, the variation coefficient of the calculated porosities decreases monotonously, proving that porosity values calculated for small cells should not be accepted. The representative elementary volume (REV, Bear, 1972) concerning porosity for the studied granite body can be defined by the cell size, where the variation coefficient becomes stable (M. Tóth and Vass, 2011). On this basis, the aforementioned calculations suggest a REV of ~50 m. For this grid net the average porosity is 1.62% with a maximum of ~6%.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing cell size, the variation coefficient of the calculated porosities decreases monotonously, proving that porosity values calculated for small cells should not be accepted. The representative elementary volume (REV, Bear, 1972) concerning porosity for the studied granite body can be defined by the cell size, where the variation coefficient becomes stable (M. Tóth and Vass, 2011). On this basis, the aforementioned calculations suggest a REV of ~50 m. For this grid net the average porosity is 1.62% with a maximum of ~6%.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most essential features of a simulated fracture network is the size and spatial position of its communicating subsystems. In the applied software, they can be found using a properly optimized trial-anderror algorithm (M. Tóth and Vass, 2011).…”
Section: Fracture Network Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency distribution of fracture lengths is one of the most important numerical features of a fracture network (M. Tóth and Vass, 2011) and is usually different for different rock types in a reservoir. Therefore, the length frequency distribution was measured separately for brecciated and non-brecciated limestones.…”
Section: Length and Aperture Frequency Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connectivity of a fracture group can be defined by the proportion of the interconnected fractures. It essentially depends on the D, E and the orientation values of the fracture network (M. Tóth and Vass, 2011). In this paper a fracture group was considered well-communicating if it contains more than 5% of all simulated fractures from the modeled volume.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length distribution of the fractures is one of the most important numerical features of a fracture network (M. Tóth and Vass 2011), and it can be easily different for each rock type in a given reservoir. Therefore, we analysed the fracture length distribution separately for breccia and limestone.…”
Section: Length and Aperture Distribution Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%