2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2005.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the fractal dimension anisotropy of the spatial faults distribution and the paleostress fields on a Variscan granitic massif (Central Spain): the F-parameter

Abstract: The spatial distribution of faults is usually described as a fractal set characterised by the fractal dimension. In this work, we have filtered fault patterns interpreted from digital elevation models, aerial photographs and field maps, by using structural geological parameters of the stress ellipsoid (stress tensor direction and stress ratio R 0 ) and age of deformation. From these filtered structural maps, we have obtained the fractal dimension associated with the fracture patterns developed during Permo-Tri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is intensely fractured with a predominance of strike-slip and normal faults ( Fig. 2a and b) (Doblas, 1989;Campos et al, 1996;Pérez-López et al, 2005). Two principal paleostress fields, deduced from stress inversion of fault-slip data and fractal analysis of fault distribution, characterize the stress evolution of the massif (CSN, 2000;Pérez-López et al, 2005): a) a N-S extensional field probably related to a Late Permian-Early Triassic tectonic event (240 ± 10 Ma), which produced an important system of dikes and quartz veins and E-W normal faults, N60E right lateral strike-slip faults and N120E left lateral strike-slip faults and b) an Alpine field (Eocene to present?)…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is intensely fractured with a predominance of strike-slip and normal faults ( Fig. 2a and b) (Doblas, 1989;Campos et al, 1996;Pérez-López et al, 2005). Two principal paleostress fields, deduced from stress inversion of fault-slip data and fractal analysis of fault distribution, characterize the stress evolution of the massif (CSN, 2000;Pérez-López et al, 2005): a) a N-S extensional field probably related to a Late Permian-Early Triassic tectonic event (240 ± 10 Ma), which produced an important system of dikes and quartz veins and E-W normal faults, N60E right lateral strike-slip faults and N120E left lateral strike-slip faults and b) an Alpine field (Eocene to present?)…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a and b) (Doblas, 1989;Campos et al, 1996;Pérez-López et al, 2005). Two principal paleostress fields, deduced from stress inversion of fault-slip data and fractal analysis of fault distribution, characterize the stress evolution of the massif (CSN, 2000;Pérez-López et al, 2005): a) a N-S extensional field probably related to a Late Permian-Early Triassic tectonic event (240 ± 10 Ma), which produced an important system of dikes and quartz veins and E-W normal faults, N60E right lateral strike-slip faults and N120E left lateral strike-slip faults and b) an Alpine field (Eocene to present?) with a strike-slip regime and maximum horizontal stress orientated N160E, which basically shapes the present morphology of the massif and develops N160E normal faults, N120-140E right lateral strike-slip faults, N10-30E left lateral strike-slip faults and N60-70E thrust faults (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the lithospheric folding implies large-scale deformation and large wavelength in vertical movements, the active tectonic slip-rate operating in the SCS has to be estimated from Pleistocene, at least. Pérez-López et al (2005) described the stress-field at the South Border of the SCS as strike-slip to uniaxial extension from Eocene to present. Martín-Velázquez et al (2009) modeled this stress-field by using finite elements and a punctual rheological model obeying the thermal model of Tejero and Ruiz (2002).…”
Section: Geodynamic and Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%