The smooth-joint contact model based on distinct element method has been widely used to represent discontinuity in the simulation of fractured rock mass, but there is rare efficient guidance for the selection of proper parameters of smooth-joint contact model, which is the basement for using this model properly. In this paper, the effect of smooth joint parameters on the macroscopic properties and failure mechanism of jointed rock under triaxial compression test is investigated. The numerical results reveal that the friction coefficient of smooth joint plays a dominant role in controlling mechanical behaviors. The stiffness of smooth joint has a relative small influence on the mechanical behaviors. Poisson ratio decreases with the reduction of normal stiffness but increases with the reduction of shear stiffness. The reduction of smooth joint strength, which is determined by normal strength, cohesion, and friction angle of smooth joint, contributes to the breakage of bonded smooth joint and ultimately decreases the strength of the specimen. We proposed a detailed calibration process for smooth-joint contact model according to the relationship between smooth-joint parameters and mechanical properties. By following this process, the numerical results are validated against corresponding experimental results and good agreement between them can be found in stress-strain curves and failure modes of different joint orientations. Further analyses from the microperspective are performed by looking at transmission of contact force, the nature and distribution of microcracks, and the particle displacement to show the failure process and failure modes.KEYWORDS compression test, distinct element method, failure mode, smooth-joint contact
| INTRODUCTIONThe mechanical behavior of jointed rock mass is strongly dependent on the combined behavior of intact rock and joints. According to different criterions, joints can be classified into various types, eg, persistent/nonpersistent joints based on the presence of collinear rock bridges, filled/unfilled joints based on the containing of soft materials such as clays, and rough/smooth joints based on the surface characteristic. In the case of unfilled joints, the roughness and compressive strength of the joint walls are found important, while in the case of filled joints, the physical and mechanical properties of the filling material are of primary concern 1 . Moreover, joint roughness has been recognized to have a significant impact on the shear behavior of joints 2 . In many engineering structures constructed within or upon rock masses, such