“…After the screening of titles and abstracts, 172 articles were excluded and 35 potentially eligible articles were retrieved for analysis of the full text. Among them, 19 eligible articles (8,10,11,14,15,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) qualified for the meta-analysis. Of the 16 excluded, 9 were not appropriate in their design (12,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43), 3 were duplicated publications (9, 44, 45), 2 included fewer than 20 cases (46,47), and 2 were review articles (48,49) (Fig.…”