2018
DOI: 10.1134/s0036024418030068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Standard Enthalpies/Entropies of Formation and Topological Structural Characteristics for Saturated Hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Hence, to correlate the molecular structures of hydrocarbon compounds with their standard enthalpies of formation, some researchers tried to develop predictive models for standard enthalpies of formation utilizing the quantitative structure−property relationship (QSPR) methods, 14 in which the molecular structure features are commonly characterized using the derived topological indices (descriptors) from molecular graphs. 15 Dolomatov et al 16 developed a multiple regression model to predict the standard enthalpies of formation for 59 saturated hydrocarbons. By characterizing the carbon bonds and the molecule branching features using the Wiener and Randićindices, this model provided improved accuracy compared with the previously proposed single-factor model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Hence, to correlate the molecular structures of hydrocarbon compounds with their standard enthalpies of formation, some researchers tried to develop predictive models for standard enthalpies of formation utilizing the quantitative structure−property relationship (QSPR) methods, 14 in which the molecular structure features are commonly characterized using the derived topological indices (descriptors) from molecular graphs. 15 Dolomatov et al 16 developed a multiple regression model to predict the standard enthalpies of formation for 59 saturated hydrocarbons. By characterizing the carbon bonds and the molecule branching features using the Wiener and Randićindices, this model provided improved accuracy compared with the previously proposed single-factor model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%