Relationship Between Small Group Problem‐Solving Activity and Lectures in Health Science Curricula

Abstract

Components of problem-based education, such as small group teaching, are being implemented in diverse health curricula. Implementation, however, is often motivated by the intuitive appeal of many problem-based learning components, when what is needed is the detailed examination of how these components support students' integration of knowledge as well as continuity of their learning experiences. This study presents an investigation of the relationship between lecture and small group teaching (SGT) in a medical curriculum. Four problem-oriented SGT sessions representing diverse topics in the first-year curriculum and their corresponding lectures were videotaped and analyzed using techniques of concept mapping, where the broad concepts from the lectures were identified and matched to the case-specific concepts in the small group sessions. The results show that lectures function as an anchor for the students' discussion of issues relevant to clinical problem-solving and interventions in small group sessions. These discussions extended to contextual aspects of clinical practice that were not dealt with in the lectures, such as ethical/cultural issues around the treatment of patients. Furthermore, small group environments were found to promote discussions that allowed the integration of information from different sources and encompassed concepts across a number of disciplines. These results suggest that carefully designed small group sessions serve the purposes of 1) illustrating broader concepts in lectures to case-specific, clinically relevant problem-solving and 2) promoting knowledge integration from diverse sources of information. The implications of these results for learning and reasoning in health science curricula are discussed.Dr. Patel is Professor and

Development and evaluation of learning module on clinical decision-making in Prosthodontics

“…Trainees educated in the blended format described above do not make more accurate decisions than individuals trained in a purely classroom-based program, but they sample a wider variety of data sources, seek information from higher-quality and more desirable sources, have better understanding of the underlying diseases, and provide more sophisticated rationales and explanations for their treatment decisions. [ 1 11 12 ]…”

Evaluation of oral microbiology lab curriculum reform

“…Traditional oral microbiology courses consist of lectures only without any practical experience. With the increasing update of oral microbiology, the traditional teaching model was unable to meet the needs of students [ 4 , 12 – 15 ]. That is the reason that we introduced a new lab curriculum.…”

Using optimal combination of teaching–learning methods (open book assignment and group tutorials) as revision exercises to improve learning outcome in low achievers in biochemistry

“…It is difficult for most of the students to learn and understand Biochemistry because of the extensive information and pathways in it . However, lectures provide only little interaction between the students and also between the students and the teacher . In lectures, the role of the students is passive and they also get little opportunity to get their doubts clarified and to reinforce the concepts they have learnt during the lecture classes .…”

“…Group discussions are at the center of medical education in this regard because it has been found that the students learn concepts more efficiently and also retain them longer when small group discussions are conducted . Small group discussions consolidate knowledge rather than the knowledge acquisition . Hence using teaching–learning methods in conjunction with lectures may serve to reinforce the concepts and result in deeper learning and better academic performance.…”