Relationship between skin moisture and medical device related pressure injury (MDRPI) in intensive care units: Prospective study

Bubun, Juhelnita; Yusuf, Saldy; Darwis, Muhammad

doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.11.009

Cited by 4 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this review, we found 12 studies that reported MDRPI incidence or prevalence as a primary outcome, of which eight were prospective studies. 13,22,24,27,30,[32][33][34] Despite being prospective, only two of these studies reported MMPI data, 22,27 of which only one provided sufficient data to enable calculation of incidence. 27 This finding suggests that the recommendation to collect MMPI data in incidence and prevalence studies is not being adhered to.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…33 When only patients with medical devices in situ were included in the sample, MDRPI incidence was between 22% and 26%. 24,32 Given that the proportions of possible MMPI reported in these studies were also wide-ranging, it is not possible to even broadly estimate either MMPI incidence or prevalence from the data currently available.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sample size ranged from very small (n = 32) 32 to very large (n = 102 865). 13 Three studies included only patients with medical devices in situ, 24,32,34 therefore true cross-sectional incidence was unable to be calculated for these studies. The four largest studies, with sample sizes in excess of 2000, reported prevalence data.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In another study, personal communication confirmed that none of the 13 MDRPI that were reported were MMPI. 24 However, only subjects with a medical device in situ were included in this study. These five studies all reported ICU samples, although Coyer et al 29 also reported a non-ICU sample.…”

Section: Mucous Membrane Pressure Injury Incidence and Prevalencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings

Fulbrook

Lovegrove

Miles

et al. 2021

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mucous membrane pressure injury (MMPI) is associated with a history of medical device use at the site of injury. The current international guideline recommends they should be reported in incidence and prevalence studies. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the incidence and prevalence of hospital-acquired MMPI in adults admitted to acute hospital settings. Database searches (EBSCO CINAHL Complete, EBSCO Medline Complete, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science) were undertaken between October 2019 and February 2021, using search terms related to hospital-acquired, mucosal and device-related pressure injury/ulcer incidence and prevalence. Searches were limited to the English language. Articles published between 2008 and 2020, reporting incidence or prevalence of mucous membrane or medical devicerelated pressure injury in non-interventional samples were selected. Two authors assessed study bias and extracted data, with a third reviewer as arbitrator. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria; most provided incidence data.No studies were found that specifically reported MMPI incidence or prevalence. It was possible to calculate incidence or prevalence from four studies; all were in intensive care settings. MMPI incidence of 0.8% and 30.4%, and prevalence of 1.7% and 3.7% were found. One study provided data that enabled calculation of prevalence of 0.1% in a non-intensive care sample. Only one other study provided specific data about MMPI.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mucous Membrane Pressure Injury Incidence and Prevalencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings

Fulbrook

Lovegrove

Miles

et al. 2021

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…29,30,32 However, a total of 66.7% (n = 6) did not meet the validity criteria. 27,28,31,[33][34][35] A summary of these outcomes is provided in Table S3, whereby the results reflect unreported outcomes, or any unclear issues identified within each domain.…”

Section: Quality Appraisal Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Skin hydration measurement and the prediction of the early development of pressure ulcers among at risk adults: A systematic review

Wilson

Avşar

Patton

et al. 2022

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review aimed to examine skin hydration and determine if this biophysical parameter can predict pressure ulcer development in at risk adults. A literature search was conducted in March 2022, using PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases. A total of 1727 records were returned, with 9 studies satisfying the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a pre‐designed extraction tool and a narrative synthesis of the data was undertaken. The methodological quality of the included articles was assessed using the evidence‐based librarianship checklist. Included studies were published between 1997 and 2021, with most using a prospective cohort design (88.9%, n = 8). The mean sample size was 74 participants (SD = 38.6; median 71). All studies measured skin hydration objectively, with 55.6% (n = 5) using the Corneometer® CM825 and 33.3% (n = 3) of studies reported a statistically significant association between skin hydration and pressure ulcer development. The mean evidence‐based librarianship percentage was 66.6% (SD: 20.7%), however, only 33.3% (n = 3) of studies scored ≥75%, indicating validity. The quality of included studies, methodology variation, and reported results has reduced the homogeneity of outcomes. This review highlights the requirement for future research evidence to ascertain the role of skin hydration in pressure ulcer development.

show abstract

Relationship between skin temperature and medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care unit

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relationship between skin moisture and medical device related pressure injury (MDRPI) in intensive care units: Prospective study

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings

Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings

Skin hydration measurement and the prediction of the early development of pressure ulcers among at risk adults: A systematic review

Relationship between skin temperature and medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care unit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About