2017
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between self‐reported cognitive difficulties, objective neuropsychological test performance and psychological distress in chronic pain

Abstract: Cognitive concerns in chronic pain reflected objective neurocognitive performance. This was moderated by anxiety, such that self-reported cognition was more consistent with objective performance in those with high anxiety. Our findings suggest that reported cognitive concerns should be heeded, and self-report measures may be used clinically to facilitate dialogue about cognitive functioning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, it was an indirect effect through self-efficacy. This might be because appropriate levels of anxiety during learning could sustain the excitement of learning, thereby strengthening learning initiative and consciousness (Wang and Cheng, 2005). However, excessive levels of anxiety would be counterproductive.…”
Section: Indirect Effect Of Tas On Se Through Academic Emotions and Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, it was an indirect effect through self-efficacy. This might be because appropriate levels of anxiety during learning could sustain the excitement of learning, thereby strengthening learning initiative and consciousness (Wang and Cheng, 2005). However, excessive levels of anxiety would be counterproductive.…”
Section: Indirect Effect Of Tas On Se Through Academic Emotions and Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (Cockshell & Mathias, 2010Ickmans et al, 2013;Majer et al, 2008) who found impaired cognitive performance in CFS (in contrast to, e.g., Cockshell & Mathias 2014), concluded that speed is most often reduced, while deficits in memory and attention domains are more infrequent (Cockshell & Mathias, 2013). Similar to patients with CFS, studies on chronic pain patients have reported associations between outcomes in subjective assessment of cognition and poorer attention and executive function performances (Baker et al, 2018;Landrø et al, 2013;Tesio et al, 2015). Baker and colleagues (2018) have reported strong associations between EMQ and objective tests such as speed and complex attention in patients with chronic pain and recommend that the EMQ may be a suitable indicator of cognitive difficulty in persons with pain since it is quick to administer (Baker et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Relations Between Subjective and Objective Cognitive Finmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to patients with CFS, studies on chronic pain patients have reported associations between outcomes in subjective assessment of cognition and poorer attention and executive function performances (Baker et al, 2018;Landrø et al, 2013;Tesio et al, 2015). Baker and colleagues (2018) have reported strong associations between EMQ and objective tests such as speed and complex attention in patients with chronic pain and recommend that the EMQ may be a suitable indicator of cognitive difficulty in persons with pain since it is quick to administer (Baker et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Relations Between Subjective and Objective Cognitive Finmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, measures in the main and primary replication sample are self‐reported, so further research using clinician‐administered measures, including formal, standardized, objective neurocognitive testing, are needed to provide more nuanced and well‐controlled information regarding symptom profiles and cognitive function. Though objective evaluations of cognitive performance are typically preferred, evidence suggests that subjective measures correspond well with objective findings (Baker, Gibson, Georgiou‐Karistianis, & Giummarra, ; Burmester et al, ; Chu et al, ; Hong, Lee, Sunwoo, Sohn, & Lee, ), including specifically the MOS‐CFS (Klein et al, ). Further, the Yale–Penn Study cohort used a well‐validated and widely used objective measure of cognitive performance that yielded significant results consistent with the other samples and suggesting that the findings based on self‐reported measures are valid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%