2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between restricted dissimilarity functions, restricted equivalence functions and normal EN-functions: Image thresholding invariant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result given in Proposition 24 is just the way of constructing divergence measures proposed by Montes [32] and Bustince [8]. D(A, B) = 0, then D(A, C) = 0.…”
Section: Therefore We Have Max(d(a∪c B ∪C) D(a∩c B ∩C)) ≤ D(a B)mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The result given in Proposition 24 is just the way of constructing divergence measures proposed by Montes [32] and Bustince [8]. D(A, B) = 0, then D(A, C) = 0.…”
Section: Therefore We Have Max(d(a∪c B ∪C) D(a∩c B ∩C)) ≤ D(a B)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some potential properties of fuzzy equivalencies could be considered [29]: In [6], Bustince et al presented the concept of restricted equivalence function, which arises from the concept of fuzzy equivalence and some properties usually demanded from the measures used for comparing images [7,8]. The conditions for restricted equivalence functions are stronger than those of fuzzy equivalencies.…”
Section: E(x Y) E(y Z)) ≥ E(x Z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations