2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02341-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between residual atheroma burden and neointimal growth in patients undergoing stenting

Abstract: This study failed to demonstrate a clinically significant relationship between quantitative volumetric and cross-sectional measures of residual atheroma burden and subsequent neointimal growth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These intriguing observations raised the possibility that the bulk of the intimal proliferation may be occurring at the original site of the lesion and led to an initial enthusiasm for plaque removal by adjunctive atherectomy before BMS implantation with results pointing to a reduction in the incidence of in-stent restenosis [11]. Nevertheless, the role of PBS remained controversial, as there were also studies reporting no association between post-BMS placement PBS and neointimal tissue growth [4, 12]. On the other hand, IVUS analyses in the DES era supported the notion that late in-stent neointimal proliferation is not related to the amount of residual PBS after DES implantation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intriguing observations raised the possibility that the bulk of the intimal proliferation may be occurring at the original site of the lesion and led to an initial enthusiasm for plaque removal by adjunctive atherectomy before BMS implantation with results pointing to a reduction in the incidence of in-stent restenosis [11]. Nevertheless, the role of PBS remained controversial, as there were also studies reporting no association between post-BMS placement PBS and neointimal tissue growth [4, 12]. On the other hand, IVUS analyses in the DES era supported the notion that late in-stent neointimal proliferation is not related to the amount of residual PBS after DES implantation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%