2022
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between predisposing and facilitating factors: Does it influence the risk of developing peri‐operative pressure injuries?

Abstract: This study examined the relationship between the personal predisposing factors of patients and the severity of pressure injuries (PIs) developed during surgery. This retrospective cohort study collected 439 cases of peri‐operative PIs. Using binary logistic regression to identify the variables associated with PI severity, the effects of interactions between associated variables were then tested. The results of this study revealed that among the personal predisposing factors, only higher patient age (P = .001) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the same positioning devices are used in all surgeries, we assume that this bias may reflect differences in the orientation and tilt of the patient’s body axis that occur when using positioning devices or that are caused by the patient’s body balance. Generally, the nutritional status, a history of diabetes mellitus, a high body mass index, prolonged surgery, and massive blood loss are considered risk factors for surgery-related PI 2 , 29 , 30 . The present study examined results of these previous studies using an index reflecting nutritional and body mass indexes in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the same positioning devices are used in all surgeries, we assume that this bias may reflect differences in the orientation and tilt of the patient’s body axis that occur when using positioning devices or that are caused by the patient’s body balance. Generally, the nutritional status, a history of diabetes mellitus, a high body mass index, prolonged surgery, and massive blood loss are considered risk factors for surgery-related PI 2 , 29 , 30 . The present study examined results of these previous studies using an index reflecting nutritional and body mass indexes in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity has many localised effects on pressure load. Although extra subcutaneous fat can provide better subcutaneous cushioning, reduce the degree of local tissue deformation, and prevent the occurrence of pressure ulcers, greater weight leads to an increase in pressure load and increases the risk of pressure ulcers 22 . Biomechanical modelling shows that with an increase in BMI, the protective effect of fat on tissue deformation is gradually offset by the increased pressure load caused by higher body weight, and the risk of pressure ulcers gradually increases 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extra subcutaneous fat can provide better subcutaneous cushioning, reduce the degree of local tissue deformation, and prevent the occurrence of pressure ulcers, greater weight leads to an increase in pressure load and increases the risk of pressure ulcers. 22 Biomechanical modelling shows that with an increase in BMI, the protective effect of fat on tissue deformation is gradually offset by the increased pressure load caused by higher body weight, and the risk of pressure ulcers gradually increases. 23 The large body weight of obese patients, especially morbidly obese patients, creates greater local stress and makes turning care extremely difficult, though this is mitigated to some extent by adequate medical staffing in the ICU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is a sub‐project of a large‐scale research project; some of the results have already been published 31 . Data collection began after gaining approval from the institutional review board, Office of Human Research at Taipei Medical University—Joint Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: N202106059).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%