2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01061.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Precipitating Agents and Neurophysiological Abnormalities in Migraine

Abstract: The particular mechanisms of migraine anticipation by different precipitating agents are still unknown. The contingent negative variation (CNV) was recorded in the premenstrual and ovulation phases of the cycle in both rest and stress conditions in 17 migraine and 15 healthy women. In migraineurs a significant increase of amplitude of the initial CNV component in the premenstrual phase compared with ovulation was observed. During both the ovulation and premenstrual phases both migraineurs and controls demonstr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(62 reference statements)
4
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies found that higher CNV was associated with relatively higher stress and arousal levels (Brown, Fenwick, & Howard, 1989;Nagai et al, 2004;Tecce, 1972). The results of a study by Siniatchkin et al (2006) also showed that healthy women under experimental achievement stress had increased iCNV amplitude compared with those under control conditions. More interestingly, studies found that high-trait anxious individuals had a greater CNV than lowtrait anxious individuals who performed at comparable levels (Ansari & Derakshan, 2011;Glanzmann & Froehlich, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies found that higher CNV was associated with relatively higher stress and arousal levels (Brown, Fenwick, & Howard, 1989;Nagai et al, 2004;Tecce, 1972). The results of a study by Siniatchkin et al (2006) also showed that healthy women under experimental achievement stress had increased iCNV amplitude compared with those under control conditions. More interestingly, studies found that high-trait anxious individuals had a greater CNV than lowtrait anxious individuals who performed at comparable levels (Ansari & Derakshan, 2011;Glanzmann & Froehlich, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Previous CNV studies examined clinical samples with anticipatory deficits, such as schizophrenia (Wynn et al, 2010); posttraumatic stress disorder (Kimble, Ruddy, Deldin, & Kaufman, 2004) and migraine (Siniatchkin, Averkina, & Gerber, 2006;Siniatchkin, Gerber-von, Darabaneanu, Stephani, et al, 2011;Siniatchkin, Sandor, Schoenen, & Gerber, 2003); motor disorders, such as Parkinsonism (Oishi, Mochizuki, Du, & Takasu, 1995); or attention deficits, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Banaschewski et al, 2003). Electrophysiological studies also revealed that CNV can be modulated by stress and anxiety in otherwise healthy samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hormonal fluctuations may in fact facilitate the "hypervigilance pattern," which subtends increased response to multimodal stimuli in migraine or FM, whose female prevalence is well known [37]. In fact, other event-related potentials (e.g., contingent negative variation) appear to vary in migrainous and nonmigrainous women in relation to menstrual phases [38], exhibiting enhanced levels of cortical arousal during perimenstrual phase. The general impression emerging from the few human studies exploring menstrual cycle fluctuations by neurophysiological methods is that subtle changes in neuromodulation of sensory perception may subtend increased pain sensitivity with a transient prevalence of excitatory versus inhibitory influences.…”
Section: Neurophysiological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While fluctuations over the migraine cycle likely account for intra-subject variability, there is no unanimously accepted explanation for the between-subject differences (8,9). It has been shown that stress is able to increase event-related potentials by decreasing habituation to a greater degree in migraine patients than in healthy subjects (10), and just before a migraine attack (11). In theory, there could be multiple connections between stress and abnormality of cortical evoked potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%