2016
DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2016.1146671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between post-awakening salivary cortisol and melatonin secretion in healthy participants

Abstract: Abstract:We report the relationship between patterns of post-awakening salivary melatonin and cortisol secretion in healthy participants (n=51; mean age 21.6 ± 5.0 years). Saliva samples were collected within the domestic setting, at 0, 15, 30 and 45 min post-awakening on 2 consecutive typical weekdays. Analyses were undertaken on data with electronically verified sample timing accuracy (< 5 min delay between awakening and the start of saliva sampling).Melatonin secretion declined linearly by an average of 29%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the question of how to deal with data derived from saliva samples of known timing which are termed inaccurate in so far as they have not been collected when the researcher asked them to be collected becomes imperative. In the past it has been recommended (Stalder et al, 2016) and practised (Ramachandran et al, 2016;Smyth et al, 2015b) to exclude such data from analyses. However, this is a wasteful and costly approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the question of how to deal with data derived from saliva samples of known timing which are termed inaccurate in so far as they have not been collected when the researcher asked them to be collected becomes imperative. In the past it has been recommended (Stalder et al, 2016) and practised (Ramachandran et al, 2016;Smyth et al, 2015b) to exclude such data from analyses. However, this is a wasteful and costly approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the two larger sample studies of Smyth et al, (2013a) and Ramachandran et al, (2016) it was possible to use MEMs in the vast majority of cases (86%) to monitor electronically collection times of samples 2-4. Missing sampling times in the 14% minority of cases were due either to participants opening and closing the track cap bottle too quickly so that the times were not recorded and/or leaving the bottle open for the sampling period despite being instructed to open and close the bottle at each sampling time.…”
Section: Electronic Monitoring Of Sampling Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations