2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Between Physical and Psychosocial Aspects in Science Laboratory Learning Environment

Abstract: The learning environment needs to be adjusted in line with the learning outcomes and teaching strategies, while at the same time, fulfills so, it provides not only information for meas y in and the relationship between physical and psychosocial aspects of science laboratory learning environment in schools in the state of f psychosocial science laboratory learning environment was measured using Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), while the physical environment was measured using Physical Science La… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers are less satisfied with their current or actual school laboratories in terms of having the opportunity to do more laboratory work through open inquiry (Halim et al, 2012). The low level of open-endedness in the science laboratory environment was also reported in previous studies in various countries (Ahmad et al, 2012;Berg et al, 2003;Fraser & McRobbie, 1995;Halim et al, 2012;Lee & Fraser, 2002;Rahman et al, 2015). Current laboratory classes are usually very coordinated with theoretical classes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Teachers are less satisfied with their current or actual school laboratories in terms of having the opportunity to do more laboratory work through open inquiry (Halim et al, 2012). The low level of open-endedness in the science laboratory environment was also reported in previous studies in various countries (Ahmad et al, 2012;Berg et al, 2003;Fraser & McRobbie, 1995;Halim et al, 2012;Lee & Fraser, 2002;Rahman et al, 2015). Current laboratory classes are usually very coordinated with theoretical classes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This study aims to depict perceptions on psychosocial aspects that include student cohesiveness, open-endedness, classroom integration, rule clarity, and material environment (Ahmad et al, 2012;Fraser & Griffiths, 1992). The existence of a positive psychosocial environment can foster intellectual activity, improve the quality of social contact, stimulate student learning and development of skills, and prevent the emergence of negative events involving students (Ahmad et al, 2012). Besides, this study will also reveal the relationship between laboratory learning environments and the chemistry teachers' satisfaction of teaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise level is seen as the noise coming from the student's environment and is perceived as a distraction and decreases concentration [121]. High noise levels, speech intelligibility, irritable behavior, disruption of information retrieval, message communication, and acoustic comfort may substantially impact the learning process for students [122]. Additionally, some students could find loud settings upsetting or distracting.…”
Section: Hypothesis A3 (Ha3) Tactile Learning Style Significantly And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of the activity of field trips becomes an experience that can be used as a role model memory for teaching practices by PSTs. The exact condition of the field trip is observed to have been analyzed in the relevant literature through the perception of the conditions of the psychosocial learning environment of PSTs which included environmental interactions, integration of activities in the classroom and outside the classroom, student cohesiveness, teacher support, open-endedness, preparation and organization, as well as material environment (Ahmad et al, 2012;Fraser & Treagust, 1986;Orion et al, 1997). Activities designed in a positive psychosocial environment stimulate intellectual activity, boost social contact, and promote student learning and development, and limit the occurrence and display of negative behavior among students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activities designed in a positive psychosocial environment stimulate intellectual activity, boost social contact, and promote student learning and development, and limit the occurrence and display of negative behavior among students. (Ahmad et al, 2012). This study discusses the design of field trip activities for PSTs as well as the psychosocial assessment of PSTs for content learning of science concepts from the perspective of expectations and the reality of field trip activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%