2001
DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2001.31.5.835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Personality Type, SAT score and GPA of Student Nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of finding students in all type is ESFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ, and ENFJ. The significance of finding students in all 16 personality type categories is consistent with Lee et al's study [6] where data revealed dental students were predominantly of four personality types (ISTJ, ISTP, ESTJ, ESTP), and Lim et al's study [7] where data revealed nursing students were predominantly of personal type (ISTJ, ESTJ, ESFJ, ISFJ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The significance of finding students in all type is ESFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ, and ENFJ. The significance of finding students in all 16 personality type categories is consistent with Lee et al's study [6] where data revealed dental students were predominantly of four personality types (ISTJ, ISTP, ESTJ, ESTP), and Lim et al's study [7] where data revealed nursing students were predominantly of personal type (ISTJ, ESTJ, ESFJ, ISFJ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As premature retirement and unemployment rate rise, external factors are more seriously considered than internal factors. A concrete example is that in the past, students applied for admission in nursing colleges with a sense of social duty, or to serve the community (Lim, et al, 2001). At present, however, the nursing job is preferred because of its very high employment prospects, as high as 97.8% (Armed Forces Nursing Academy, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…학업성취는 학교과정을 통해 습득된 지식, 태도, 가치관 등 학습결 과를 총칭하는 것이나 (Kim, 2003), 대학생의 학업성취도에 관한 연구에서는 학업성취를 주로 표준화된 성취도 검사결과나 학점평균 (grade point average, GPA)으로 정의하며, 이러한 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 개인 내적 특성들인 개인변인 접근과 교육과정 특성 이나 학습환경 등과 같은 개인 외적 특성인 과정변인 접근연구가 주로 이루어졌다 (Kim & Cho, 2001;Ku, 1989;Minton & Schneider, 1980;Neisser et al, 1996;Wolfe & Johnson, 1995). 그러나 실제 학업성취도는 인지적 능력 외에도 다양한 비인 지적 요인들에 의해 영향을 받으며, 그 대표적인 비인지적 요인으로 성격 (Lee et al, 2009;Lim et al, 2001;Seo, 2010), 유능감 및 자존감 (Kang, 2010;Lee, 2008), 성취동기 및 자기조절학습 Chun & Song, 2012;Kim, 2010;Kim, 2011;Park & Kim, 2004;Song & Park, 2000;Yang et al,, 2012) . 특히 성취목표지향성은 학업성취를 예언하는 요인이며, 학습 동기와 관련되는 주요 변인으로 숙달접근, 숙달회피, 수행접근, 수행 회피의 2×2, 4개 요인으로 구성된다.…”
unclassified