2015
DOI: 10.1186/2052-1847-7-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between perceived exertion and blood lactate concentrations during incremental running test in young females

Abstract: BackgroundTo investigate more practical handling of Borg’s ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and category-ratio scale of RPE (CR-10), we evaluated interrelationships between RPE, CR-10, and blood lactate concentrations (bLa) during incremental treadmill running tests for young females with different aerobic fitness levels.MethodsOxygen consumption, heart rate, bLa, RPE, and CR-10 were measured from distance runners (DR; n = 15), race walkers (RW; n = 6), and untrained females (UT; n = 11). These variables co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study the duration of each increment was 5 min to assure steady state conditions for oxygen uptake, blood lactate and heart rate during submaximal stages. This protocol has been applied in several other studies (Sperlich et al 2010 , 2011b ; Abe et al 2015 ) and a recent study confirmed that heart rate, end-exercise blood levels of lactate and RER do not differ between different incremental protocols, and maximum oxygen uptake is approx. 4.2 % lower compared to ramp testing (Sperlich et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the present study the duration of each increment was 5 min to assure steady state conditions for oxygen uptake, blood lactate and heart rate during submaximal stages. This protocol has been applied in several other studies (Sperlich et al 2010 , 2011b ; Abe et al 2015 ) and a recent study confirmed that heart rate, end-exercise blood levels of lactate and RER do not differ between different incremental protocols, and maximum oxygen uptake is approx. 4.2 % lower compared to ramp testing (Sperlich et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A large body of literature shows that RPEs correlate highly with physiological parameters such as heart rate, oxygen consumption and lactate during exercise (e.g. Abe, Yoshida, Ueoka, Sugiyama, & Fukuoka, ; Borg, ). Strong relationships between RPE and cardiorespiratory as well as metabolic variables have been reported for different populations: children, young and older adults, and trained, untrained and sedentary persons, as well as for persons with obesity or coronary artery disease (Coquart et al, ; Demello, Cureton, Boineau, & Singh, ; Elsangedy et al, ; Groslambert & Mahon, ; Scherr et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 This misrepresentation of training stress could lead to maladaptation or periods of non-functional overreaching in runners. On the other hand, training load measures likely provide a more individualized assessment of the physiological training response 13 and overall training stress experienced by a runner. 5 Thus, we urge coaches to consider thinking beyond just weekly volume and to incorporate measures of training loads in their monitoring approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), the global RPE for an entire training session, encompasses both the psychological and physiological response to training 6 and has been used to assess internal load since it is highly correlated with blood lactate levels even as training intensifies. 13,14 In fact, the combination of sRPE and training duration to measure training load is correlated with blood lactate measured 30 minutes following maximal training sessions while training impulse (TRIMP) measured from HR intensity distribution is not. 14 Therefore, the combination of sRPE and duration to measure training load is not only convenient but might also be a more appropriate method to assess training stress compared to other methods requiring measurements of HR (e.g., TRIMP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%