2016
DOI: 10.1108/mf-05-2015-0145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between operational risk management, size, and ownership of Indian banks

Abstract: Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:331053 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that external and internal injuries usually are closely linked to the individual institution, Apatachioae (2014) operational data in banks should be quite detailed to include a clear and comprehensive classification of the all the internal weaknesses when adoption changes. Sharifi et al (2016), studied the relationship between operational risk management, bank size, and ownership in 61 Indian banks during the period from 2010 to 2013 and found out that there is no significant relationship between ownership whether public, private or foreign and excess capital held by banks for managing operational risk. Wiley (2013) contend that after the end of some rogue businesses events in the 90s, the BCBS came up with a framework for managing and providing regulatory services for operational risks in financial institutions.…”
Section: Operational Risk Management (Orm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that external and internal injuries usually are closely linked to the individual institution, Apatachioae (2014) operational data in banks should be quite detailed to include a clear and comprehensive classification of the all the internal weaknesses when adoption changes. Sharifi et al (2016), studied the relationship between operational risk management, bank size, and ownership in 61 Indian banks during the period from 2010 to 2013 and found out that there is no significant relationship between ownership whether public, private or foreign and excess capital held by banks for managing operational risk. Wiley (2013) contend that after the end of some rogue businesses events in the 90s, the BCBS came up with a framework for managing and providing regulatory services for operational risks in financial institutions.…”
Section: Operational Risk Management (Orm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most emerging economies, banks play the dominant role in the financial markets, while the capital markets tend to develop later. The Indian banks are no exception as a high proportion (about 33 percent) of household savings is held as deposits with banks and other financial intermediaries (Sharifi et al , 2016). The credit risk management in Indian banks assumes significance in the context of large number of small deposit accounts.…”
Section: Motivation For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal fraud, External fraud, Employment practices and the safety in the working place, Clients, products and business practices, Damage to physical assets, Business disruption and system failures, Execution, delivery and process management. Operational losses happen in US firms is mainly due to the failure of internal control (Sharifi, Haldar, & Rao, 2016).…”
Section: Operational Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%