1990
DOI: 10.1016/0739-6260(90)90080-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between microstructure and nutritional and nutritional properties of starch in pre-cooked legume flours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been attributed to the release of starch granules from the protein matrix, making the starch content more susceptible to enzymatic digestion. An increase in digestibility after thermal treatments may be attributed to some factors like cell wall encapsulated starch, and physical disintegration of seeds (Tovar et al 1991). Similarly, significantly higher starch digestibility was also observed when samples were malted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This has been attributed to the release of starch granules from the protein matrix, making the starch content more susceptible to enzymatic digestion. An increase in digestibility after thermal treatments may be attributed to some factors like cell wall encapsulated starch, and physical disintegration of seeds (Tovar et al 1991). Similarly, significantly higher starch digestibility was also observed when samples were malted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Native legume starches have been found to be more digestible than native potato or high amylose maize starch, but less digestible than native cereal or cassava starch (Dreher et al, 1984;Frins et al, 1998;Hoover and Sosulski, 1985a;Ring et al, 1988;Socorro et al, 1989;Tovar et al, 1991). Hoover and Sosulski (1985a) have shown that during a 6h digestion with porcine pancreatic a.-amylase, maize starch was hydrolyzed to the extent of 75%, whereas, at the same enzyme concentration, the corresponding value for legume starches belonging to the biotype Phaseolus vulgaris ranged from 25 to 35%.…”
Section: Hydrolysis Of Legume Starchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced bioavailability of legume starches has been attributed to the presence of intact tissue/cell structures enclosing starch granules, higher levels of amylose (30 -65%), high content of viscous soluble dietary fiber components, the presence of a large number of antinutrients, 'B' type crystallites and strong interactions between amylose chains (Deshpande and Cheryan, 1984;Hoover and Sosulski, 1985a;Siddhuraju and Becker, 2001;Tovar et al, 1991;Wursch et al, 1986). Table 2-11 presents the in vitro amylolysis of legume starches by a-amylase from different origins.…”
Section: Hydrolysis Of Legume Starchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the preparation richer in chickpea flour resulted less easily hydrolyzed (Figure 1; Table 3). Starch-containing cells in whole cooked legumes such as chickpea, possess remarkably rigid cell walls, whose mechanical resistance persists even in boiled and mildly homogenized samples (Tovar et al, 1990;Tovar et al, 1992a;Tovar et al, 1991) which, in addition to the particular features of their starch constituents, result in low digestion rates (Björck et al, 1994;García-Alonso et al, 1998;Granfeldt et al, 1992). However, as the alternative flour used in the pasta preparation was obtained by milling of raw chickpeas, their starch moiety is likely to be in a free granular state (Tovar et al, 1991).…”
Section: Starch Hydrolysis Index Of Products "As Eaten"mentioning
confidence: 99%