2003
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2549:rbljpa>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Low-Level Jet Properties and Turbulence Kinetic Energy in the Nocturnal Stable Boundary Layer

Abstract: In the nighttime stable boundary layer (SBL), shear and turbulence are generated in the layer between the maximum of the low-level jet (LLJ) and the earth's surface. Here, it is investigated whether gross properties of the LLJ-its height and speed-could be used to diagnose turbulence intensities in this subjet layer. Data on the height and speed of the LLJ maximum were available at high vertical and temporal resolution using the high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL). These data were used to estimate a subjet la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
181
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
18
181
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, buoyant turbulence production (instead of loss) may occur over steep slopes even in statically stable conditions [188,189]. Despite being essentially turbulent, katabatic flows or other flows with a low-level wind maximum do not match the standard ABL structure [185,190,191]. Therefore, the applicability of MOST or of local scaling approaches for katabatic flow has been called into question [192] and is a matter of on-going debate [191].…”
Section: The Stable Boundary Layer Over Slopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, buoyant turbulence production (instead of loss) may occur over steep slopes even in statically stable conditions [188,189]. Despite being essentially turbulent, katabatic flows or other flows with a low-level wind maximum do not match the standard ABL structure [185,190,191]. Therefore, the applicability of MOST or of local scaling approaches for katabatic flow has been called into question [192] and is a matter of on-going debate [191].…”
Section: The Stable Boundary Layer Over Slopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NBL depths are close between 0000 and 0700 LST, but differ significantly between about 2000 and 2400 LST; sunset is at around 1945 LST in July and 1915 LST in August. For these cases, the NBL depths using f = 0.1 and f = 0.05 have been compared to subjective estimates of NBL depths based on the lidar wind-speed profiles (e.g., Banta et al 2003;Pichugina and Banta 2010). Comparing results from all profiles during the study period, the value of f = 0.1 produced a better agreement with the subjectively determined NBL depths; therefore we selected f = 0.1 for this dataset.…”
Section: Defining the Nbl Depth Using Fractional σ 2 Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turbulent mixing occurs when Ri is below a critical threshold, typically values smaller than 0.4 (e.g. Banta et al 2003). A long or short-tail function f (Ri) is implemented and artificially increases the vertical mixing in stable boundary layers so that higher nocturnal near-surface winds are simulated than observed (Brown et al 2006(Brown et al , 2008Sandu et al 2013).…”
Section: Stable Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%