Soil N is not used to guide N fertilization of turfgrass due to a lack of soil test correlation and calibration research for this purpose. We could find only one paper in the literature that examined the reliability of soil NO 3 -N concentrations to estimate turfgrass response (Rieke and Ellis, 1974). The authors concluded that soil NO 3 -N was not a reliable estimator of turfgrass response, but the design of the experiment and the analysis of the data were completed using standard methods from the 1970s and not contemporary methods of soil test correlation and calibration.Methods to develop soil tests have changed greatly since the 1970s. Current methods require a three-step process of soil test correlation, calibration, and then interpretation of data to develop recommendations. Correlation and calibration are usually completed in one set of experiments and development of recommendations in another set of experiments if the correlation and calibration steps were successful (Dahnke and Olson, 1990).Soil test correlation is the process of establishing a relationship between the extractable concentrations of the soil nutrient of interest, in this case NO 3 -N, and the yield or quality of the plant of interest, in this case turfgrass (Dahnke and Olson, 1990