The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between intention of novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccination and vaccination coverage rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the relatively low response rate (54.8%) may have resulted in a biased sample and become potential threats to the generalizability of the findings to the whole population. This response rate, however, is comparable to or even higher than that of many mailing or telephone surveys in other countries [12], [16], [29], [30]. Third, although the measure of each construct was carefully developed, the unknown validity and reliability of the study instruments may be of concern, and could result in the difficulties in making cross-population comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Second, the relatively low response rate (54.8%) may have resulted in a biased sample and become potential threats to the generalizability of the findings to the whole population. This response rate, however, is comparable to or even higher than that of many mailing or telephone surveys in other countries [12], [16], [29], [30]. Third, although the measure of each construct was carefully developed, the unknown validity and reliability of the study instruments may be of concern, and could result in the difficulties in making cross-population comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The hesitation of women to vaccinate when the second (after the vaccine against hepatitis B virus) anticancer vaccine became finally available has been also described in other vaccines. The most recent example is the vaccine against novel influenza A (H1N1), where, despite the acutely threatening nature of the condition and the high demand for a vaccine, the actual coverage rates after the vaccine became available remained generally low [15,16]. It appears that public uptake generally depends on a balance between fear of the disease and fear of the potential adverse effects of the vaccine [15,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also obtained vaccination status data on participants who refused to participate, which shows similar vaccination rates between the two groups. In addition, participants were recruited postpartum, therefore we were able to measure actual vaccine uptake and not just vaccination intention [70], an unreliable measure of actual vaccination status [71,72]. Nevertheless, the low number of respondents who were actually vaccinated may have limited the study power to identify other factors associated with vaccine uptake.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%