2016
DOI: 10.1353/jda.2016.0149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between individual and structural determinants on job satisfaction–analysis of employee turnover in the Indian context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on job satisfaction and turnover intention found that in different employee groups in different countries, such as private institutions in Taiwan [38]. [42] confirmed the negative correlation between teachers' job satisfaction and resignation intention. In recent years, the employee turnover rate is on the rise [43].…”
Section: Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Studies on job satisfaction and turnover intention found that in different employee groups in different countries, such as private institutions in Taiwan [38]. [42] confirmed the negative correlation between teachers' job satisfaction and resignation intention. In recent years, the employee turnover rate is on the rise [43].…”
Section: Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…One of the biggest challenges for the human resource professional is to retain employees. Employee turnover has grown in complexity (Arekar, Jain, Desphande & Sherin, 2016). Motivation is closely connected to employee turnover.…”
Section: Employee Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction is key element when it comes to employee turnover (Griffeth et al, 2000), important prerequisite for effective performance and given that the organizational climate arises from mutual efforts and relations of groups within the organization (Hashemi & Sadeqi, 2016), one of the important determinants for understanding the employee turnover (Arekar et al, 2016), make sure their employees have a high enough level (Thompson & Lane, 2014), only through quality motivation systems can company increase its competitive advantage and value (Hashemi & Sadeqi, 2016), tends to be one of the best predictors of employee turnover (Griffeth et al, 2000), studied not just to handle the turnover but also there are other adverse effects of dissatisfaction like absenteeism, low performance, lower morale, low contribution to the team, less coordination, less orientation (Varma, 2017).…”
Section: Job Satisfaction In Human Resources Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%