2014
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2014.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between In Vivo Receptor Occupancy and Efficacy of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 Allosteric Modulators with Different In Vitro Binding Profiles

Abstract: Allosteric modulators of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu 5 ) have exciting potential as therapeutic agents for multiple brain disorders. Translational studies with mGlu 5 modulators have relied on mGlu 5 allosteric site positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands to assess receptor occupancy in the brain. However, recent structural and modeling studies suggest that closely related mGlu 5 allosteric modulators can bind to overlapping but not identical sites, which could complicate interp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58,27,28 We also assessed selectivity of 17d , 17e , and 17g versus the other remaining six mGlu receptors in our standard fold-shift assay paradigm at a 10 μ M concentration. 30,31,33,36 17d and 17g were selective against mGlu 2,3,5,6,7,8 , inducing less than a ~2-fold shift of the glutamate CRC at 10 μ M. 17e was selective versus mGlu 2,3,8 (less than ~2-fold shift of glutamate CRC at 10 μ M, a modest 2.7-fold shift at mGlu 5 , and larger shifts at mGlu 6 (6.7) and mGlu 7 (7.0). Thus, the mGlu 1 PAMs are suitable for in vivo studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,27,28 We also assessed selectivity of 17d , 17e , and 17g versus the other remaining six mGlu receptors in our standard fold-shift assay paradigm at a 10 μ M concentration. 30,31,33,36 17d and 17g were selective against mGlu 2,3,5,6,7,8 , inducing less than a ~2-fold shift of the glutamate CRC at 10 μ M. 17e was selective versus mGlu 2,3,8 (less than ~2-fold shift of glutamate CRC at 10 μ M, a modest 2.7-fold shift at mGlu 5 , and larger shifts at mGlu 6 (6.7) and mGlu 7 (7.0). Thus, the mGlu 1 PAMs are suitable for in vivo studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible that in vivo efficacy requires high mGlu 3 receptor occupancy, a property that has been reported for mGlu 1 and mGlu 5 NAMs (33,34). In contrast, mGlu receptor positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) can produce full efficacy with relatively low occupancy in the CNS because of the contributions of both affinity and cooperativity to PAM potency at a receptor (35,36). Unfortunately, there are currently no selective mGlu 3 radioligands that would allow us to measure receptor occupancy of VU0477950.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 F-3-Fluoro-5-[(pyridin-3-yl)ethynyl] benzonitrile ( 18 F-FPEB) is a metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu 5 ) antagonist used in preclinical (9, 10) and clinical PET neuroimaging research (11, 12). Radiosynthesis of 18 F-FPEB and several structurally related radiotracers for mGlu 5 has been challenging because nucleophilic aromatic substitution by 18 F-fluoride is not a favored reaction due to the absence of electron-withdrawing groups located ortho or para to the labeling site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%