1998
DOI: 10.3233/bmr-1998-10305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between hand size, grip strength and dynamometer position in women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathiowetz et al 1985;Schmidt and Toews 1970), gender dierences (e.g. Fiebert et al 1998;Schmidt and Toews 1970;Hanten et al 1999). Fiebert et al 1998;Schmidt and Toews 1970;Hanten et al 1999).…”
Section: Grip Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathiowetz et al 1985;Schmidt and Toews 1970), gender dierences (e.g. Fiebert et al 1998;Schmidt and Toews 1970;Hanten et al 1999). Fiebert et al 1998;Schmidt and Toews 1970;Hanten et al 1999).…”
Section: Grip Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidt and Toews 1970;Mathiowetz et al 1985;Balogun et al 1991), and correlations with stature and weight (e.g. Studies of the eects of hand size on grip strength have given mixed results: Harkonen et al (1993) and Firrell and Crain (1996) found no relationships, while Fiebert et al (1998) found that grip strength was correlated with hand length in female subjects. Studies of the eects of hand size on grip strength have given mixed results: Harkonen et al (1993) and Firrell and Crain (1996) found no relationships, while Fiebert et al (1998) found that grip strength was correlated with hand length in female subjects.…”
Section: Grip Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if it has been demonstrated that healthy individuals produce the least reliable test-re-test coeffi cients, then this study on healthy individuals should further reassure clinicians that the dynamometers considered should be acceptable for patients seen and treated within clinics. This study recruited healthy young students under 50 years of age, and although it has been suggested that age is not a signifi cant factor in grip strength up to 50 years (Fiebert et al 1998, MacDermid et al 2002, this study cannot offer insight into the test-re-test reliability of the dynamometers with an older population, which is more likely to have general muscle strength decline. This study also did not ask participants to rate the comfort of gripping the dynamometers, nor compared the cost of each -both aspects would have increased the clinical utility of the results here.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…it is not a static measure. Grip strength testing is affected by fatigue (Trossman and Li 1989), diurnal variation (Patel et al 2004) and positioning of the upper limb on assessment (Fiebert et al 1998, Fong and Ng 2001, Watanabe et al 2005. With this natural variation already present, it is important that grip strength is measured as reliably and as accurately as possible, using the most reliable type of assessment tool (Svens andLee 2005, Innes 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, rehabilitating and rein stating people with hand injuries into their work envi ronment are an important issue. Grip strength measurement is clinically important in determining the functionality of the upper extremi ties [1]. Successful rehabilitation largely depends on an early diagnosis, as well as on physical, psychologi cal, and occupational conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%