Abstract:Countries disburse subsidies with various motivations, for example, to promote industrial development, facilitate innovation, support national champions, and ensure redistribution. The devolution of subsidies may however also encourage economic activities leading to climate change related concerns, reflected through higher greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, if such activities are conducted beyond sustainable point. Through a cross-country empirical analysis involving 131 countries over 1990-2010, the present a… Show more
“…These two types of subsidies have heterogeneous impacts on CER (Wu & Chen, 2022); thus, the negative effect of government environmental subsidies on carbon emissions documented by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) could derive from the overproduction effect induced by the general government subsidies. Besides, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) focus on the carbon emissions at country level rather than firm level, which could lead to biased findings because the government subsidizes the firm's environment-friendly projects but not the public who is also the contributor of carbon emissions. In this paper, we document a positive relationship between government environmental subsidies and corporate carbon performance and thus contribute to this literature stream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our study contributes to the emerging literature concerning the environmental effect of government subsidies. The existing literature has investigated how government subsidies affect corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate environmental responsibility (CER), innovation activities, green innovation, and nationwide carbon reductions (Liu, Quan, et al, 2019; Mukherjee & Chakraborty, 2014; Wang & Zhang, 2020; Xia et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2021). It is worth noting that there are two gaps in the literature: (i) there are no studies that pay attention to the impact of government subsidies from the perspective of corporate carbon performance; (ii) there are only a few studies that differentiate government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies, such as Ren et al (2021) and Wu and Chen (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014)’s findings could be biased due to the failure to extract government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies. These two types of subsidies have heterogeneous impacts on CER (Wu & Chen, 2022); thus, the negative effect of government environmental subsidies on carbon emissions documented by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) could derive from the overproduction effect induced by the general government subsidies. Besides, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) focus on the carbon emissions at country level rather than firm level, which could lead to biased findings because the government subsidizes the firm’s environment-friendly projects but not the public who is also the contributor of carbon emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a cross-country sample, they show that government subsidies increase carbon emissions. However, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014)'s findings could be biased due to the failure to extract government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies. These two types of subsidies have heterogeneous impacts on CER (Wu & Chen, 2022); thus, the negative effect of government environmental subsidies on carbon emissions documented by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) could derive from the overproduction effect induced by the general government subsidies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that there are two gaps in the literature: (i) there are no studies that pay attention to the impact of government subsidies from the perspective of corporate carbon performance; (ii) there are only a few studies that differentiate government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies, such as Ren et al (2021) and Wu and Chen (2022). The closest prior study to ours is conducted by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) who explore the impact of government subsidies on carbon emissions at the country level. Using a cross-country sample, they show that government subsidies increase carbon emissions.…”
Improving corporate carbon performance is imperative for sustainable economic and social development. Using a sample of Chinese A-share-listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2019, this study explores how government environmental subsidies affect corporate carbon performance. The baseline results show that government environmental subsidies are positively associated with corporate carbon performance, suggesting an improving effect of government environmental subsidies on corporate carbon performance. These results are robust to a set of sensitivity tests. Further, the channel analyses show that government environmental subsidies improve corporate carbon performance by alleviating financial constraints and enhancing environmental information disclosure. Moreover, cross-sectional analyses show that the improving effect of government environmental subsidies on corporate carbon performance is stronger in state-owned enterprises, in firms with higher executive environmental awareness, and in firms with higher media attention. This study provides meaningful insights for the government seeking to promote low-carbon development through environmental subsidies.
“…These two types of subsidies have heterogeneous impacts on CER (Wu & Chen, 2022); thus, the negative effect of government environmental subsidies on carbon emissions documented by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) could derive from the overproduction effect induced by the general government subsidies. Besides, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) focus on the carbon emissions at country level rather than firm level, which could lead to biased findings because the government subsidizes the firm's environment-friendly projects but not the public who is also the contributor of carbon emissions. In this paper, we document a positive relationship between government environmental subsidies and corporate carbon performance and thus contribute to this literature stream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our study contributes to the emerging literature concerning the environmental effect of government subsidies. The existing literature has investigated how government subsidies affect corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate environmental responsibility (CER), innovation activities, green innovation, and nationwide carbon reductions (Liu, Quan, et al, 2019; Mukherjee & Chakraborty, 2014; Wang & Zhang, 2020; Xia et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2021). It is worth noting that there are two gaps in the literature: (i) there are no studies that pay attention to the impact of government subsidies from the perspective of corporate carbon performance; (ii) there are only a few studies that differentiate government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies, such as Ren et al (2021) and Wu and Chen (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014)’s findings could be biased due to the failure to extract government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies. These two types of subsidies have heterogeneous impacts on CER (Wu & Chen, 2022); thus, the negative effect of government environmental subsidies on carbon emissions documented by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) could derive from the overproduction effect induced by the general government subsidies. Besides, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) focus on the carbon emissions at country level rather than firm level, which could lead to biased findings because the government subsidizes the firm’s environment-friendly projects but not the public who is also the contributor of carbon emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a cross-country sample, they show that government subsidies increase carbon emissions. However, Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014)'s findings could be biased due to the failure to extract government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies. These two types of subsidies have heterogeneous impacts on CER (Wu & Chen, 2022); thus, the negative effect of government environmental subsidies on carbon emissions documented by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) could derive from the overproduction effect induced by the general government subsidies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that there are two gaps in the literature: (i) there are no studies that pay attention to the impact of government subsidies from the perspective of corporate carbon performance; (ii) there are only a few studies that differentiate government environmental subsidies from the general government subsidies, such as Ren et al (2021) and Wu and Chen (2022). The closest prior study to ours is conducted by Mukherjee and Chakraborty (2014) who explore the impact of government subsidies on carbon emissions at the country level. Using a cross-country sample, they show that government subsidies increase carbon emissions.…”
Improving corporate carbon performance is imperative for sustainable economic and social development. Using a sample of Chinese A-share-listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2019, this study explores how government environmental subsidies affect corporate carbon performance. The baseline results show that government environmental subsidies are positively associated with corporate carbon performance, suggesting an improving effect of government environmental subsidies on corporate carbon performance. These results are robust to a set of sensitivity tests. Further, the channel analyses show that government environmental subsidies improve corporate carbon performance by alleviating financial constraints and enhancing environmental information disclosure. Moreover, cross-sectional analyses show that the improving effect of government environmental subsidies on corporate carbon performance is stronger in state-owned enterprises, in firms with higher executive environmental awareness, and in firms with higher media attention. This study provides meaningful insights for the government seeking to promote low-carbon development through environmental subsidies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.