2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between feeding schedules and gastric distress during retinopathy of prematurity screening eye examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 8 studies (N = 421), researchers assessed crying time as an outcome. Four studies 31,34,35,48 were excluded from synthesis (Supplemental Table 3). Strube et al 35 found that feeding infants 1 hour before their eye examination reduced cry time compared with feeding 2 hours before (MD = 19%; P = .016).…”
Section: Crying Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 8 studies (N = 421), researchers assessed crying time as an outcome. Four studies 31,34,35,48 were excluded from synthesis (Supplemental Table 3). Strube et al 35 found that feeding infants 1 hour before their eye examination reduced cry time compared with feeding 2 hours before (MD = 19%; P = .016).…”
Section: Crying Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies 31,34,35,48 were excluded from synthesis (Supplemental Table 3). Strube et al 35 found that feeding infants 1 hour before their eye examination reduced cry time compared with feeding 2 hours before (MD = 19%; P = .016). Mehta et al 48 found no infants cried during the procedure when a speculum was not used, compared with 2 infants who cried when a speculum was used and 1 infant who cried when wide-field digital retina imaging was used but no statistical tests were conducted.…”
Section: Crying Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In RCTs, comparisons between the use of individualised care methods, such as the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program, as opposed to standard care, revealed no major differences, although the former approach was associated with a shorter time to recover from the stress of ROP screening. Feeding the newborn infant an hour before the test reduced the stress of the test (22,23). Quality of evidence: very low.…”
Section: Screening For Ropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous, different studies demonstrated that the combined use of nonpharmacological analgesia and local anaesthetics produced better results in terms of reducing pain. The recommended intervention may have few inconsequential side effects, even though it has not been shown in high-quality studies to be beneficial (19,20,23,26,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). Quality of evidence: low.…”
Section: Quality Of Evidence: Lowmentioning
confidence: 99%