2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between ductility and the porosity of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to the mechanical properties, Gong et al [ 103 ] concluded that the tensile strength and fatigue resistance of as-built Ti6Al4V samples are not influenced by 1 vol% of gas pores but are considerably degraded with a volume fraction of 5 vol%. The same conclusions can be rewritten for AlSi10Mg as-built samples [ 14 , 104 ]. In this scenario, the hot isostatic pressing (HIP) HT can be used not only to densify the material but also to reduce the residual stress [ 105 , 106 ].…”
Section: Laser-powder Bed Fusion (L-pbf) Processmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In relation to the mechanical properties, Gong et al [ 103 ] concluded that the tensile strength and fatigue resistance of as-built Ti6Al4V samples are not influenced by 1 vol% of gas pores but are considerably degraded with a volume fraction of 5 vol%. The same conclusions can be rewritten for AlSi10Mg as-built samples [ 14 , 104 ]. In this scenario, the hot isostatic pressing (HIP) HT can be used not only to densify the material but also to reduce the residual stress [ 105 , 106 ].…”
Section: Laser-powder Bed Fusion (L-pbf) Processmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Likewise, with the results shown in Fig. 20, Laursen et al found that porosity (both in terms of fracture surface and bulk material porosities) had a much stronger correlation with elongation than with stiffness or strength for LPBF AlSi10Mg for porosity levels of up to 5% (Archimedes method) [92]. LoF pores being particularly detrimental to vertically built samples were explained by Ronneberg, Davies and Hooper, in their study on LPBF 316L, to be due to how the major axis of LoF pores is oriented relative to the tensile axis as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As can be observed, elongation at fracture is generally reported to be far more sensitive to porosity level as compared to strength. The detrimental nature of pores is typically explained through (i) a reduction in the true loadbearing area, (ii) the facilitation of pore coalescence leading to premature failure, (iii) increased stressconcentration points, (iv) acting as initiation sites for micro-cracking, and (iv) providing a preferential path for crack propagation [75,83,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95]. These issues are frequently reported to be worse for vertically built samples due to the orientation of LoF pores and/or interlayer pores (i.e., pores that are distributed along layer boundaries) [75,90,[96][97][98][99][100][101][102].…”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding ductility, in a rather brittle alloy like AM AlSi10Mg, pores are expected to serve as failure initiating features, thereby seeding damage nucleation and reducing overall ductility; indeed, multiple empirical models have shown a correlation between increasing porosity and reduced ductility of AM AlSi10Mg. 26 Similar correlations between porosity and mechanical properties are exhibited in cast aluminum. 25,27,28 Porosity, and other heterogeneities formed by LPBF typically lead to more variability in mechanical performance compared with wrought material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%