2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between dimensions of muscles of mastication (masseter and lateral pterygoid) and skeletal dimensions: Study of 40 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence already exists linking, for example, changes in the orientation of the bony orbits, the cranial base angle and the angle between the petrous bones with relative differences of brain size [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Similarly, differences in the size and force production capabilities of the jaw-closing muscles have been linked to changes in the proportions of, for instance, the face, mandible and calvarium [11][12][13][14][15]. By contrast, there is comparatively little evidence to evaluate the proposition that the demands of the brain and masticatory muscles can pervade interceding adaptations of the skull to influence each other [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence already exists linking, for example, changes in the orientation of the bony orbits, the cranial base angle and the angle between the petrous bones with relative differences of brain size [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Similarly, differences in the size and force production capabilities of the jaw-closing muscles have been linked to changes in the proportions of, for instance, the face, mandible and calvarium [11][12][13][14][15]. By contrast, there is comparatively little evidence to evaluate the proposition that the demands of the brain and masticatory muscles can pervade interceding adaptations of the skull to influence each other [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation reported here extends their myostatin-deficient mouse model approach and evaluates the relationship with measurements of endocranial volume which is more intimately linked to the size of the brain. This study re-evaluates the hypothesis that enlargement of the masticatory muscles constrains enlargement of the underlying brain and its surrounding endocranial cavity by testing the null prediction that-the larger myostatin-deficient mice [22,35] have the same sized, if not slightly larger, endocrania in comparison with wild-types in order to accommodate the increases of brain size needed to service the motor and proprioceptive requirements of a larger number of muscle fibres [14,39]. [23] and were backcrossed for several generations on a C57BL/6J background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume and dimensions of the chewing muscles have a direct relationship with the bone structures from where the muscles originate (Azaroual et al, 2014). Throughout the years, males have acquired a stronger musculature (Lopez-Capp et al, 2018) than females; hence, such impressions left onto skeletal structures may justify the high degree of sexual dimorphism in human skulls, as previously described in other studies using dry mandibles (Datta et al, 2015;Vinay et al, 2013;Franklin et al, 2008;Indira et al, 2012;Kharoshah et al, 2010;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Computer tomography (CT) studies have also found comparable results with masseter muscle thickness and length showing a negative correlation with the mandibular plane angle (Azaroual et al, 2014).…”
Section: T a B L E 1 Baseline Data For The Sample Of Class Ii Maloccl...mentioning
confidence: 85%