1955
DOI: 10.1037/h0043162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between diagnostic category and deviant verbalizations on the Rorschach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IQ was also covaried out. Although the Delta Index, a research scale measuring pathological thinking, yielded no significant statistical differences, the means (anorexics 12.85; schizophrenics, 17.61) were consistent with those reported previously for schizophrenics (17.7, Kataguchi, 1959) and borderline schizophrenics (10.5, Powers and Hamlin, 1955). ANCOVAs were performed on location scores (W, D, Watkins & Stauffacher, 1952).…”
Section: Rorschach Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…IQ was also covaried out. Although the Delta Index, a research scale measuring pathological thinking, yielded no significant statistical differences, the means (anorexics 12.85; schizophrenics, 17.61) were consistent with those reported previously for schizophrenics (17.7, Kataguchi, 1959) and borderline schizophrenics (10.5, Powers and Hamlin, 1955). ANCOVAs were performed on location scores (W, D, Watkins & Stauffacher, 1952).…”
Section: Rorschach Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Included here are responses that have been referred to traditionally in the Rorschach literature as contaminations, confabulations, fabulized combinations, peculiar verbalizations, etc. The utility of these categories for assessing pathological thinking has been demonstrated in a number of studies (Hertz & Paolino, 1960;Powers & Hamlin, 1955;Silverman, Lapkin, & Rosenbaum, 1962;Watkins, & Stauffacher, 19S2).…”
Section: Scoring Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their ratings it was agreed that the judges would use the cutting point between 2 and 3, that is, Points 1 and 2 for unimproved and Points 3, 4, and 5, for improved. The efficacy of rating scales was evaluated from the work of (Grauer, 1953;Powers & Hamlin, 1955;Watkins & Stauffacher, 1952).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these report relatively little predictive value from the sign approach. In comparing the diagnosticsign and content-analysis approaches in their investigations, (Grauer, 1953;Powers & Hamlin, 1955;Watkins & Stauffacher, 1952;Zubin, 1954), reported that the latter seems to be more reliable than the former as a procedure. A comparison by (Goldman, 1960), between the two approaches in evaluating the improvement to be expected from schizophrenic patients receiving therapy demonstrated that the content-analysis was more reliable than the diagnostic-sign approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%