2015
DOI: 10.17507/jltr.0603.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Cultural Intelligence and Pragmatic Comprehension

Abstract: Abstract-Cultural intelligence is supposed to be influential to the development of pragmatic comprehension as individuals with a higher cultural intelligence can more easily navigate and understand unfamiliar cultures and adjust their behaviors to perform effectively in culturally diverse situations. To assess the actual relationship between cultural intelligence and pragmatic comprehension ability, a study was conducted over 120 Iranian learners of English in the intensive English program of universities in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that those EFL learners who have higher CQ are more successful in the IELTS Listening Test and vice versa. This finding is in line with findings obtained in studies conducted by (Rafieyan, Golerazeghi & Orang, 2015;Ghonsooly & Shalchy 2013;Fatemi, Najafzade & Sadeghzade, 2015), who found a strong positive relationship between cultural intelligence, pragmatic comprehension, speaking and writing ability, and job satisfaction, respectively. The results also confirm findings by Khodadady and Ghahari (2012), indicating that cultural intelligence as measured by CQS is negatively associated with TOEFL and its structure subtest.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It means that those EFL learners who have higher CQ are more successful in the IELTS Listening Test and vice versa. This finding is in line with findings obtained in studies conducted by (Rafieyan, Golerazeghi & Orang, 2015;Ghonsooly & Shalchy 2013;Fatemi, Najafzade & Sadeghzade, 2015), who found a strong positive relationship between cultural intelligence, pragmatic comprehension, speaking and writing ability, and job satisfaction, respectively. The results also confirm findings by Khodadady and Ghahari (2012), indicating that cultural intelligence as measured by CQS is negatively associated with TOEFL and its structure subtest.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Translation students who were more immersed in the source language culture adopting assimilation and integration acculturation attitudes presented a higher quality of translation of culture-bound text than translation students who were less immersed in the source language culture adopting separation and marginalization acculturation attitudes. Therefore, language learners who are on educational sojourns should be encouraged and provided with opportunities to assimilate or integrate into the host country culture to be able to develop their intercultural competence to an optimal level (Rafieyan et al, 2015a;Rafieyan et al, 2015b;Rafieyan, in press).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language learners who were more immersed in the target language culture adopting assimilation and integration attitudes enhanced their target language pragmatic competence during the educational sojourn to a greater extent than language learners who were less immersed in target language culture adopting separation and marginalization attitudes. Therefore, language learners who are on an educational sojourn should be encouraged and provided with opportunities to immerse in target language culture to be able to develop their pragmatic competence to an optimal level (Rafieyan et al, 2015a;Rafieyan et al, 2015b;Rafieyan, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%